دورية أكاديمية

Hemodynamic support in the early phase of septic shock: a review of challenges and unanswered questions

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Hemodynamic support in the early phase of septic shock: a review of challenges and unanswered questions
المؤلفون: Lesur, Olivier, Delile, Eugénie, Asfar, Pierre, Radermacher, Peter
المساهمون: Centre de Recherche Clinique Etienne-LeBel, Université de Sherbrooke (UdeS), Endothélium, valvulopathies et insuffisance cardiaque (EnVI), Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), MitoVasc - Physiopathologie Cardiovasculaire et Mitochondriale (MITOVASC), Université d'Angers (UA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universitätsklinikum Ulm - University Hospital of Ulm
المصدر: ISSN: 2110-5820 ; Annals of Intensive Care ; https://univ-angers.hal.science/hal-02616845Test ; Annals of Intensive Care, 2018, 8, pp.102. ⟨10.1186/s13613-018-0449-8⟩ ; https://annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13613-018-0449-8Test.
بيانات النشر: HAL CCSD
SpringerOpen
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: Catecholamines, Decatecholaminization, Fluid resuscitation, Hemodynamic support, Mean arterial pressure, Metabolic stress, Microcirculation, Sepsis, septic shock, Vasoactive drugs, Vasopressor(s), [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
الوصف: International audience ; BACKGROUND: Improving sepsis support is one of the three pillars of a 2017 resolution according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Septic shock is indeed a burden issue in the intensive care units. Hemodynamic stabilization is a cornerstone element in the bundle of supportive treatments recommended in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) consecutive biannual reports. MAIN BODY: The "Pandera's box" of septic shock hemodynamics is an eternal debate, however, with permanent contentious issues. Fluid resuscitation is a prerequisite intervention for sepsis rescue, but selection, modalities, dosage as well as duration are subject to discussion while too much fluid is associated with worsen outcome, vasopressors often need to be early introduced in addition, and catecholamines have long been recommended first in the management of septic shock. However, not all patients respond positively and controversy surrounding the efficacy-to-safety profile of catecholamines has come out. Preservation of the macrocirculation through a "best" mean arterial pressure target is the actual priority but is still contentious. Microcirculation recruitment is a novel goal to be achieved but is claiming more knowledge and monitoring standardization. Protection of the cardio-renal axis, which is prevalently injured during septic shock, is also an unavoidable objective. Several promising alternative or additive drug supporting avenues are emerging, trending toward catecholamine's sparing or even "decatecholaminization." Topics to be specifically addressed in this review are: (1) mean arterial pressure targeting, (2) fluid resuscitation, and (3) hemodynamic drug support. CONCLUSION: Improving assessment and means for rescuing hemodynamics in early septic shock is still a work in progress. Indeed, the bigger the unresolved questions, the lower the quality of evidence.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
العلاقة: hal-02616845; https://univ-angers.hal.science/hal-02616845Test; OKINA: ua18746; PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC6206320
DOI: 10.1186/s13613-018-0449-8
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0449-8Test
https://univ-angers.hal.science/hal-02616845Test
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.5D55EBE3
قاعدة البيانات: BASE