-
1دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Pinna, Federica, Diana, Enrica, Sanna, Lucia, Deiana, Valeria, Manchia, Mirko, Nicotra, Eraldo, Fiorillo, Andrea, Albert, Umberto, Nivoli, Alessandra, Volpe, Umberto, Atti, Anna Rita, Ferrari, Silvia, Medda, Federica, Atzeni, Maria Gloria, Manca, Daniela, Mascia, Elisa, Farci, Fernando, Ghiani, Mariangela, Cau, Rossella, Tuveri, Marta, Cossu, Efisio, Loy, Elena, Mereu, Alessandra, Mariotti, Stefano, Carpiniello, Bernardo
المساهمون: Pinna, Federica, Diana, Enrica, Sanna, Lucia, Deiana, Valeria, Manchia, Mirko, Nicotra, Eraldo, Fiorillo, Andrea, Albert, Umberto, Nivoli, Alessandra, Volpe, Umberto, Atti, Anna Rita, Ferrari, Silvia, Medda, Federica, Atzeni, Maria Gloria, Manca, Daniela, Mascia, Elisa, Farci, Fernando, Ghiani, Mariangela, Cau, Rossella, Tuveri, Marta, Cossu, Efisio, Loy, Elena, Mereu, Alessandra, Mariotti, Stefano, Carpiniello, Bernardo
مصطلحات موضوعية: Diabete, Disturbed eating behavior, Eating disorder, Insulin manipulation, Adult, Feeding Behavior, Feeding and Eating Disorder, Female, Human, Italy, Male, Psychometric, Reproducibility of Result, Surveys and Questionnaire, Diabetes Mellitu, Type 1, Type 2, Psychiatry and Mental Health
الوصف: BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate in a sample of insulin-treated diabetic patients, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of the DEPS-R scale, a diabetes-specific self-report questionnaire used to analyze disordered eating behaviors. METHODS: The study was performed on 211 consecutive insulin-treated diabetic patients attending two specialist centers. Lifetime prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) according to DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria were assessed by means of the Module H of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis I Disorder and the Module H modified, according to DSM-5 criteria. The following questionnaires were administered: DEPS-R and the Eating Disorder Inventory - 3 (EDI-3). Test/retest reproducibility was assessed on a subgroup of 70 patients. The factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of DEPS-R were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 21.8% of the sample met criteria for at least one DSM-5 diagnosis of ED. A "clinical risk" of ED was observed in 13.3% of the sample. Females displayed higher scores at DEPS-R, a higher percentage of at least one diagnosis of ED and a higher clinical risk for ED. A high level of reproducibility and homogeneity of the scale were revealed. A significant correlation was detected between DEPS-R and the 3 ED risk scales of EDI-3. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirmed the overall reliability and validity of the scale. In view of the significance and implications of EDs in diabetic patients, it should be conducted a more extensive investigation of the phenomenon by means of evaluation instruments of demonstrated validity and reliability.
وصف الملف: STAMPA
العلاقة: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/28724422; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000405826200003; volume:17; issue:1; firstpage:"-"; lastpage:"-"; numberofpages:11; journal:BMC PSYCHIATRY; http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2957864Test; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85027109643; https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1434-8Test
-
2
المؤلفون: L Sanna, Rossella Cau, Maria Gloria Atzeni, Silvia Ferrari, Eraldo Francesco Nicotra, Daniela Manca, Fernando Farci, Enrica Diana, Alessandra Nivoli, Elena Loy, Andrea Fiorillo, Mirko Manchia, Valeria Deiana, Alessandra Mereu, Federica Medda, Marta Tuveri, Anna Rita Atti, Efisio Cossu, Mariangela Ghiani, Elisa Mascia, Federica Pinna, Stefano Mariotti, Umberto Albert, Umberto Volpe, Bernardo Carpiniello
المساهمون: Pinna, Federica, Diana, Enrica, Sanna, Lucia, Deiana, Valeria, Manchia, Mirko, Nicotra, Eraldo, Fiorillo, Andrea, Albert, Umberto, Nivoli, Alessandra, Volpe, Umberto, Atti, Anna Rita, Ferrari, Silvia, Medda, Federica, Atzeni, Maria Gloria, Manca, Daniela, Mascia, Elisa, Farci, Fernando, Ghiani, Mariangela, Cau, Rossella, Tuveri, Marta, Cossu, Efisio, Loy, Elena, Mereu, Alessandra, Mariotti, Stefano, Carpiniello, Bernardo
المصدر: BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, Psychometrics, lcsh:RC435-571, Concurrent validity, Validity, Reproducibility of Result, 030209 endocrinology & metabolism, Type 2 diabetes, Diabete, Feeding and Eating Disorders, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, lcsh:Psychiatry, Surveys and Questionnaires, medicine, Diabetes Mellitus, Feeding and Eating Disorder, Surveys and Questionnaire, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, Disordered eating, Insulin manipulation, Diabetes, Eating disorder, Reproducibility of Results, Diabetes Mellitu, Feeding Behavior, Disturbed eating behavior, medicine.disease, Eating Disorder Inventory, Eating disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Italy, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Female, Psychology, Type 1, Type 2, Psychometric, Clinical psychology, Human, Research Article
الوصف: Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate in a sample of insulin-treated diabetic patients, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of the DEPS-R scale, a diabetes-specific self-report questionnaire used to analyze disordered eating behaviors. Methods The study was performed on 211 consecutive insulin-treated diabetic patients attending two specialist centers. Lifetime prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) according to DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria were assessed by means of the Module H of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis I Disorder and the Module H modified, according to DSM-5 criteria. The following questionnaires were administered: DEPS-R and the Eating Disorder Inventory – 3 (EDI-3). Test/retest reproducibility was assessed on a subgroup of 70 patients. The factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of DEPS-R were assessed. Results Overall, 21.8% of the sample met criteria for at least one DSM-5 diagnosis of ED. A “clinical risk” of ED was observed in 13.3% of the sample. Females displayed higher scores at DEPS-R, a higher percentage of at least one diagnosis of ED and a higher clinical risk for ED. A high level of reproducibility and homogeneity of the scale were revealed. A significant correlation was detected between DEPS-R and the 3 ED risk scales of EDI-3. Conclusions The data confirmed the overall reliability and validity of the scale. In view of the significance and implications of EDs in diabetic patients, it should be conducted a more extensive investigation of the phenomenon by means of evaluation instruments of demonstrated validity and reliability. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1434-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
وصف الملف: STAMPA
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1728cd37698d47aebe9e2bb763778225Test
http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2957864Test
