دورية أكاديمية

Comparison of Restenosis Risk in Single-Layer versus Dual-Layer Carotid Stents: A Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of Restenosis Risk in Single-Layer versus Dual-Layer Carotid Stents: A Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation.
المؤلفون: Sýkora, Ján, Zeleňák, Kamil, Vorčák, Martin, Števík, Martin, Sýkorová, Martina, Sivák, Jozef, Rovňák, Marek, Zapletalová, Jana, Mužík, Juraj, Šinák, Igor, Kurča, Egon, Meyer, Lukas, Fiehler, Jens
المصدر: CardioVascular & Interventional Radiology; Sep2022, Vol. 45 Issue 9, p1257-1266, 10p
مصطلحات موضوعية: CAROTID artery stenosis, STENOSIS, SURGICAL stents, DUPLEX ultrasonography, RETROSPECTIVE studies, DISEASE relapse, TREATMENT effectiveness, RESEARCH funding
مستخلص: Purpose: The aim of this study was to report intermediate-term results of duplex ultrasound follow-up of carotid artery stenting performed with the dual-layer stent as compared to concurrent patients treated with other commercially available single-layer carotid stents.Materials and Methods: A single centre, retrospective, nonrandomized study including 162 non-consecutive patients with 199 implanted carotid stents treated over a 7-year period was conducted. Patients with at least one ultrasound examination after treatment were included. Procedural and follow-up data for patients treated with the dual-layer stent implantation (83 stents) vs first-generation carotid stents implantations (116 stents) were compared.Results: The median follow-up time was 24.0 months (IQR 10-32 months) for dual-layer stents and 27.5 months (IQR 10.3-59 months) for single-layer stents. The rate of severe restenosis was significantly higher in the dual-layer stent group than in the single-layer group (13.3% [11/83] vs 3.4% [4/116], p = 0.01). Seven reinterventions were performed in 5 patients with dual-layer stents. The rate of reintervention was significantly higher compared to no reinterventions in single-layer stents (6% [5/83] vs 0% [0/116], p = 0.012). Patients with restenosis had significantly higher presence of dyslipidaemia (100% [12/12] vs 63.3% [95/150], p = 0.009).Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting, the patients treated with low-profile dual-layer micromesh stent showed higher rates of restenosis and reinterventions compared to first-generation single-layer stents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of CardioVascular & Interventional Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:01741551
DOI:10.1007/s00270-022-03200-4