التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Zhang's guidelines vs WHO guidelines for diagnosing labour dystocia - Authors' reply. |
| المؤلفون: |
Bernitz, Stine1,2 (AUTHOR) stine.bernitz@so-hf.no, Dalbye, Rebecka1,2 (AUTHOR), Olsen, Inge Christoffer3 (AUTHOR), Blix, Ellen2 (AUTHOR), Øian, Pål4,5 (AUTHOR), Eggebø, Torjørn Moe6 (AUTHOR) |
| المصدر: |
Lancet. Aug2019, Vol. 394 Issue 10198, pe11-e11. 1p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
CESAREAN section, LABOR (Obstetrics), DISEASE progression, DYSTOCIA |
| مستخلص: |
We thank Annie Kroushev and her colleagues for their interest in our article that described our investigation of the effect of different labour progression guidelines.[1] As compliance is a known challenge in clinical randomised controlled trials and practice, we made an effort to minimise its effect.[1] We found that the labour dystocia diagnoses differed between the groups and that the use of oxytocin was not always in accordance with the diagnosis. [Extracted from the article] |
|
Copyright of Lancet is the property of Lancet and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Business Source Index |
