التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Theoretical stereoelectroencephalography density on the brain convexity. |
| المؤلفون: |
Minkin, Krasimir1 (AUTHOR) minkin@abv.bg, Gabrovski, Kaloyan1 (AUTHOR) kaloyangabrovski@gmail.com, Karazapryanov, Petar1 (AUTHOR) muzicantini@gmail.com, Milenova, Yoana2 (AUTHOR) joana0725@abv.bg, Sirakov, Stanimir3 (AUTHOR) ssirakov@bsunivers.com, Dimova, Petia1 (AUTHOR) psdimova@gmail.com |
| المصدر: |
Epilepsy Research. Jan2022, Vol. 179, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*EPILEPSY, *PARTIAL epilepsy, *MAGNETIC resonance imaging, *CEREBRAL hemispheres, *DENSITY, *MATHEMATICAL formulas |
| مستخلص: |
Invasive electroencephalography (EEG) remains the "gold standard" for diagnosing the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and discrepancies between seizure semiology, video-EEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. However, the possibilities of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to explore the brain surface remain a matter of debate and subdural EEG (SDEEG) is still preferred in some centers for cases when the supposed epileptogenic zone is on the brain convexity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the theoretical safe SEEG coverage on the brain convexity and to compare the theoretical SEEG cortical density with the usual SDEEG density. Our material included 10 hemispheres in 5 patients, who had been already investigated with SEEG for drug-resistant epilepsy. We translated our previously described technique in a theoretical model in an attempt to calculate the maximal number of avascular windows for each cerebral hemisphere. The distance between every entry point and the other entry points for each hemisphere was calculated using a mathematical formula. Subsequently, the theoretical SEEG coverage on the brain convexity was described using the maximal, minimal and average distances between each entry point and the closest 4 neighboring points. This type of measurement allows a direct comparison between SEEG and SDEEG in their ability to explore the brain convexity. Ten hemispheres had 1328 safe entry points with a safety margin of 2.5 mm and a minimal distance of 2.5 mm between 2 entry points (average number of entry points: 132.8 (SD ± 5). The number of entry points in the explored 10 hemispheres varied from 104 to 156. The average distance between each entry point and its 4 neighbors was 11.47 mm. The maximal distance between two entry points in these 10 hemispheres was ranging from 20.28 to 27.23 mm (average: 24.67 mm). The closest entry points for the explored hemispheres were at an average distance of 4.67 mm (range: 2.82 – 5.96 mm). The average convexity surface was 223.68 cm2 (range: 204.63–238.77 cm2). The safe electrode density without electrode collision on the cortical surface was ranging from 0.46 to 0.69 electrodes per cm2 (average: 0.59 electrodes per cm2) (SD ± 0.023). The theoretical SEEG cortical density is comparable with the usual SDEEG density. These findings, combined with the better safety profile of SEEG and the possibilities to explore deep cortical structures, explain the progressive shift from SDEEG to SEEG during the last years. • SEEG can test each anatomo-electroclinical hypothesis – superficial or deep. • The number of SEEG electrodes may be increased safely until 1 electrode per 1.69 cm2. • SEEG could provide almost the same superficial coverage with better deep exploration and less risk than SDEEG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Academic Search Index |
