دورية أكاديمية

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion versus Anterior Hybrid Fusion Surgery for Patients with Severe Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving Three or More Levels: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion versus Anterior Hybrid Fusion Surgery for Patients with Severe Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving Three or More Levels: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
المؤلفون: Hirai, Takashi, Yoshii, Toshitaka, Sakai, Kenichiro, Inose, Hiroyuki, Yuasa, Masato, Yamada, Tsuyoshi, Matsukura, Yu, Ushio, Shuta, Morishita, Shingo, Egawa, Satoru, Onuma, Hiroaki, Kobayashi, Yutaka, Utagawa, Kurando, Hashimoto, Jun, Kawabata, Atsuyuki, Tanaka, Tomoyuki, Motoyoshi, Takayuki, Takahashi, Takuya, Hashimoto, Motonori, Sakaeda, Kentaro
المصدر: Journal of Clinical Medicine; Nov2021, Vol. 10 Issue 22, p5315-5315, 1p
مصطلحات موضوعية: LONGITUDINAL ligaments, OSSIFICATION, SPINAL fusion, CERVICAL spondylotic myelopathy, SURGICAL complications, COMPARATIVE studies, RETROSPECTIVE studies
مستخلص: Various studies have found a high incidence of early graft dislodgement after multilevel corpectomy. Although a hybrid fusion technique was developed to resolve implant failure, the hybrid and conventional techniques have not been clearly compared in terms of perioperative complications in patients with severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving three or more levels. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) and anterior hybrid fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL. We therefore retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiologic data of 53 consecutive patients who underwent anterior fusion to treat cervical OPLL: 30 underwent ACCF and 23 underwent anterior hybrid fusion. All patients completed 2 years of follow-ups. Implant migration was defined as subsidence > 3 mm. There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics between the ACCF and hybrid groups. Early implant failure occurred significantly more frequently in the ACCF group (5 cases, 16.7%) compared with the hybrid group (0 cases, 0%). The fusion rate was 80% in the ACCF group and 100% in the hybrid group. Although both procedures can achieve satisfactory neurologic outcomes for multilevel OPLL patients, hybrid fusion likely provides better biomechanical stability than the conventional ACCF technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Clinical Medicine is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:20770383
DOI:10.3390/jcm10225315