دورية أكاديمية

Initial experience of using a large-bore (0.096″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Initial experience of using a large-bore (0.096″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions.
المؤلفون: Starke, Robert M, Abecassis, Isaac Josh, Saini, Vasu, Matouk, Charles C, Hassan, Ameer E, Siddiqui, Adnan H, Frei, Donald F
المصدر: Interventional Neuroradiology; Jun2024, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p372-379, 8p
مصطلحات موضوعية: CATHETERS, ARTERIAL puncture, THORACIC aorta, DIAMETER, ENDOVASCULAR surgery, TORTUOSITY
مستخلص: Introduction: The purpose of this study was to report our initial experience of using a large-bore (0.096″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 5 sites in the US for neurovascular procedures performed using a large-bore access catheter. The effectiveness outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter's successfully reaching its target vessel without conversion to direct carotid puncture or to a smaller-bore access catheter and successfully completing the intended neurointervention. Results: One hundred and thirteen procedures performed in 112 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 67.5 years (SD 16.2), and about half (49.1%) were female. The most common primary access sites were the femoral (64.6%) or radial (32.7%) artery. Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (26/81, 32.1%), type II aortic arch (17/88, 19.3%), type III aortic arch (14/88, 15.9%), bovine arch (16/104, 15.4%), severe angle (<30°) between the subclavian and target vessel (11/74, 14.9%), and subclavian loop (7/79, 8.9%). The median access time to branch view was 18 min (IQR 11-28, N = 75). The technical success rate was 94.7%. Two dissections (1.8%) were related to the large-bore access catheter. Access site complications occurred in 2 patients (1.8%). Four additional symptomatic periprocedural complications not related to the large-bore access catheter occurred (7.1%). Conclusion: For neurovascular interventions, a 0.096″ inner diameter access catheter could be used with both femoral and radial arterial approaches, had a high technical success rate, and had a low rate of periprocedural complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Interventional Neuroradiology is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:15910199
DOI:10.1177/15910199221127074