The burden of proof in co-management and results-based management: the elephant on the deck!
| العنوان: | The burden of proof in co-management and results-based management: the elephant on the deck! |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Mike Fitzpatrick, Dominic Rihan, Dave G. Reid, Norman Graham |
| المصدر: | ICES Journal of Marine Science. 68:1656-1662 |
| بيانات النشر: | Oxford University Press (OUP), 2011. |
| سنة النشر: | 2011 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | disturbance, co-management, History, sea, Ecology, Operations research, Burden of proof, Aquatic Science, Oceanography, discards, Archaeology, indicators, results-based management, Marine research, benthic impact, fisheries management, habitats, vms, impacts, burden of proof, catch, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, policy |
| الوصف: | Fitzpatrick, M., Graham, N., Rihan, D. J., and Reid, D. G. 2011. The burden of proof in co-management and results-based management: the elephant on the deck! – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68: 1656–1662. Results-based management requires that outcomes can be demonstrated by industry and verified by managers on behalf of society. The core questions are: what outcomes, and how can they be proved? Existing fishery approaches to reversing the burden of proof are examined with focus on how proof is demonstrated. Outcomes can be measured in situ (on the vessel) or ex situ (at the stock or ecosystem level). In situ measures are preferable because they give direct measurements, although they can be invasive and costly. Ex situ results are only observable on scales that make it difficult to attribute them to specific management measures, or they may be influenced by external factors. Three main environmental impacts caused by fishing are assessed with respect to how industry can assume the burden of proof. The combined use of vessel-monitoring systems and benthic-impact models may offer a practical solution to the problem of managing fishery impacts on the benthos. Three Irish fisheries are assessed in terms of the feasibility of reversing the burden of proof. There are limits to the extent to which industry can assume the burden of proof, and the concept of sharing the burden of proof could be more realistic. |
| تدمد: | 1095-9289 1054-3139 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::7105f38b99f4c153943f7d2a4932c58eTest https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsr098Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....7105f38b99f4c153943f7d2a4932c58e |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 10959289 10543139 |
|---|