Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative : patient comfort

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative : patient comfort
المؤلفون: P.S. Myles, O. Boney, M. Botti, A.M. Cyna, T.J. Gan, M.P. Jensen, H. Kehlet, A. Kurz, G.S. De Oliveira, P. Peyton, D.I. Sessler, M.R. Tramèr, C.L. Wu, Paul Myles, Michael Grocott, Bruce Biccard, Jane Blazeby, Oliver Boney, Matthew Chan, Elisabeth Diouf, Lee Fleisher, Cor Kalkman, Andrea Kurz, Ramani Moonesinghe, Duminda Wijeysundera
المصدر: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 120(4), 705. Oxford University Press
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, Consensus, Delphi Technique, Nausea, Review, Perioperative Care, surgery, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 030202 anesthesiology, Anesthesiology, medicine, Journal Article, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, Patient Comfort, Patient comfort, clinical trials, Perioperative medicine, business.industry, Benchmarking, Perioperative, anaesthesia, Clinical trial, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Research Design, patient-reported outcomes, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Physical therapy, Vomiting, medicine.symptom, business
الوصف: Background Maximising patient comfort during and after surgery is a primary concern of anaesthetists and other perioperative clinicians, but objective measures of what constitutes patient comfort in the perioperative period remain poorly defined. The Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative was established to derive a set of standardised endpoints for use in perioperative clinical trials. Methods We undertook a systematic review to identify measures of patient comfort used in the anaesthetic, surgical, and other perioperative literature. A multi-round Delphi consensus process that included up to 89 clinician researchers was then used to refine a recommended list of outcome measures. Results We identified 122 studies in a literature search, which were the basis for a preliminary list of 24 outcome measures and their definitions. The response rates for Delphi Rounds 1, 2, and 3 were 100% (n=22), 90% (n=79), and 100% (n=13), respectively. A final list of six defined endpoints was identified: pain intensity (at rest and during movement) at 24 h postoperatively, nausea and vomiting (0–6 h, 6–24 h, and overall), one of two quality-of-recovery (QoR) scales (QoR score or QoR-15), time to gastrointestinal recovery, time to mobilisation, and sleep quality. Conclusions As standardised outcomes will support benchmarking and pooling (meta-analysis) of trials, one or more of these recommended endpoints should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials assessing patient comfort and pain after surgery.
وصف الملف: image/pdf
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0007-0912
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::7a65568d2f3aef1d479c78a6378d532fTest
https://hdl.handle.net/1874/375753Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....7a65568d2f3aef1d479c78a6378d532f
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE