Electrophysiological predictors of response to subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Electrophysiological predictors of response to subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
المؤلفون: Hans-Peter Hartung, Vera Bril, Billie L. Durn, Monica Alcantara, John-Philip Lawo, Orell Mielke
المصدر: Clinical Neurophysiology. 132:2184-2190
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Injections, Subcutaneous, Neural Conduction, Axonal loss, Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Subcutaneous immunoglobulin, Placebo, Gastroenterology, Cohort Studies, Predictive Value of Tests, Physiology (medical), Internal medicine, Humans, Medicine, Aged, Retrospective Studies, biology, business.industry, Immunization, Passive, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Sensory Systems, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Compound muscle action potential, Electrophysiology, Treatment Outcome, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating, nervous system, Neurology, biology.protein, Female, Neurology (clinical), Antibody, business, Polyneuropathy, Follow-Up Studies
الوصف: Objective To assess axonal function prior to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy or placebo in relation to relapse in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to determine whether axonal damage can predict therapy response. Methods Relapse rates in patients from the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study, where patients were treated with placebo or SCIG (IgPro20), were analyzed by baseline (post-intravenous immunoglobulin stabilization) axonal damage (≤1 mV peroneal compound muscle action potential) status. Results In patients with non-axonal damage, relapses were significantly higher with placebo (73.0%) than IgPro20 (0.2 g/kg: 39.1%, 0.4 g/kg: 19.2%). In patients with axonal damage, IgPro20 had no effect on relapse (placebo: 25.0%, IgPro20: 0.2 g/kg: 30.0%, 0.4 g/kg: 19.4%). Patients with axonal damage relapsed significantly less on placebo versus non-axonal damage, but they also demonstrated higher baseline disability. Conclusion Axonal damage may correspond to relapse upon treatment withdrawal; patients with axonal damage relapse less, possibly reflecting poor response to immunoglobulin therapy, while non-axonal damage patients may experience more relapse, perhaps indicating better treatment response. Significance In CIDP patients with axonal loss, immunoglobulin therapy may not be as effective. Assessing axonal damage could help guide therapy, with immunoglobulins ideally used before substantial axonal damage arises.
تدمد: 1388-2457
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::58622cd71d9732575361a4ea8963773bTest
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.018Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....58622cd71d9732575361a4ea8963773b
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE