دورية أكاديمية

Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
المؤلفون: Brown, Fraser S., Glasmacher, Stella A., Kearns, Patrick K. A., MacDougall, Niall, Hunt, David, Connick, Peter, Chandran, Siddharthan
المصدر: PLoS ONE; 5/26/2020, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p1-13, 13p
مصطلحات موضوعية: PREDICTION models, MULTIPLE sclerosis, META-analysis, AMED (Information retrieval system), CEREBRAL atrophy, FORECASTING, STATISTICAL bias
مستخلص: The natural history of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is variable and prediction of individual prognosis challenging. The inability to reliably predict prognosis at diagnosis has important implications for informed decision making especially in relation to disease modifying therapies. We conducted a systematic review in order to collate, describe and assess the methodological quality of published prediction models in RRMS. We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full text for eligibility and assessed risk of bias. Studies reporting development or validation of prediction models for RRMS in adults were included. Data collection was guided by the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews (CHARMS) and applicability and methodological quality assessment by the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). 30 studies were included in the review. Applicability was assessed as high risk of concern in 27 studies. Risk of bias was assessed as high for all studies. The single most frequently included predictor was baseline EDSS (n = 11). T2 Lesion volume or number and brain atrophy were each retained in seven studies. Five studies included external validation and none included impact analysis. Although a number of prediction models for RRMS have been reported, most are at high risk of bias and lack external validation and impact analysis, restricting their application to routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:19326203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0233575