Right-sided colorectal cancer (RC): Response to first-line chemotherapy in FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) with focus on early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR)
العنوان: | Right-sided colorectal cancer (RC): Response to first-line chemotherapy in FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) with focus on early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Werner Scheithauer, Tobias Heintges, Jobst C. von Einem, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Swantje Held, Volker Heinemann, Dominik Paul Modest, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Frank Kullmann, Alexander Kiani, Thomas Kirchner, Thomas Decker, Julian Walter Holch, Sebastian Stintzing, Christoph Kahl |
المصدر: | Journal of Clinical Oncology. 35:3586-3586 |
بيانات النشر: | American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2017. |
سنة النشر: | 2017 |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Focus (geometry), business.industry, Colorectal cancer, Tumor shrinkage, Cancer, medicine.disease, 03 medical and health sciences, 030104 developmental biology, 0302 clinical medicine, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Internal medicine, medicine, First line chemotherapy, business |
الوصف: | 3586 Background: Recent evidence suggests that benefit from anti-EGFR treatment is restricted to RAS wild-type left-sided colorectal cancer (LC) (Holch JW et al. Eur J Cancer 2017). However, these results are preliminary. We therefore investigated patients with RC enrolled in the FIRE-3 trial, which evaluated the efficacy of first-line FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab (cet) or bevacizumab (bev) in RAS wildtype mCRC. New metrics of tumor dynamics were used to characterize the patients. Methods: The splenic flexure was used to differentiate LC from RC. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier estimation and differences were expressed using Log-Rank test, hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Central independent radiological data was used to calculate early tumor shrinkage ≥20% (ETS) and depth of response (DpR). Results: In total, 330 patients were assessable for central radiological evaluation. In patients with LC (n = 257), treatment with FOLFIRI + cet led to longer overall survival (OS) compared to FOLFIRI + bev (HR = 0.68, p = 0.016). In patients with RC (n = 68), OS was comparable between treatment arms (HR = 1.11, p = 0.715). In patients with RC and ETS < 20%, OS was inferior in patients treated with FOLFIRI + cet. In patients who reached ETS ≥20%, a comparable OS was evident between treatment arms (for further details of efficacy in patients with RC see table). Conclusions: Patients with RC do not represent a uniform population. ETS ≥20% defines a subgroup of patients where comparable treatment efficacy was observed with regard to OS, ORR and DpR by addition of cetuximab vs. bevacizumab to FOLFIRI. [Table: see text] |
تدمد: | 1527-7755 0732-183X |
الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5f66e8dccb3e1a3e34697cb337aefa8fTest https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.3586Test |
رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi...........5f66e8dccb3e1a3e34697cb337aefa8f |
قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
تدمد: | 15277755 0732183X |
---|