التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
The state of human-centered NLP technology for fact-checking. |
| المؤلفون: |
Das, Anubrata1 (AUTHOR) anubrata.das@utexas.edu, Liu, Houjiang1 (AUTHOR), Kovatchev, Venelin1 (AUTHOR), Lease, Matthew1 (AUTHOR) |
| المصدر: |
Information Processing & Management. Mar2023, Vol. 60 Issue 2, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*NATURAL language processing, *HUMAN-computer interaction, POLARIZATION (Social sciences), BODY language, MODERN society, TRUST |
| مستخلص: |
Misinformation threatens modern society by promoting distrust in science, changing narratives in public health, heightening social polarization, and disrupting democratic elections and financial markets, among a myriad of other societal harms. To address this, a growing cadre of professional fact-checkers and journalists provide high-quality investigations into purported facts. However, these largely manual efforts have struggled to match the enormous scale of the problem. In response, a growing body of Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies have been proposed for more scalable fact-checking. Despite tremendous growth in such research, however, practical adoption of NLP technologies for fact-checking still remains in its infancy today. In this work, we review the capabilities and limitations of the current NLP technologies for fact-checking. Our particular focus is to further chart the design space for how these technologies can be harnessed and refined in order to better meet the needs of human fact-checkers. To do so, we review key aspects of NLP-based fact-checking: task formulation, dataset construction, modeling, and human-centered strategies, such as explainable models and human-in-the-loop approaches. Next, we review the efficacy of applying NLP-based fact-checking tools to assist human fact-checkers. We recommend that future research include collaboration with fact-checker stakeholders early on in NLP research, as well as incorporation of human-centered design practices in model development, in order to further guide technology development for human use and practical adoption. Finally, we advocate for more research on benchmark development supporting extrinsic evaluation of human-centered fact-checking technologies. • We present a literature review on NLP fact-checking research. • We emphasize human-centered fact-checking research. • Human-in-the-loop and interactive fact-checking research is crucial for user adoption. • We motivate a greater role for Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) in NLP work in fact-checking. • Research on human factors (e.g., intelligibility, trust) will complement prior work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Information Processing & Management is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Business Source Index |
