Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease
المؤلفون: A. Jon Stoessl, Dennis A. Turner, Gary Hotton, David J. Brooks, Elena Moro, John G. Nutt, Peter Heywood, Matthew Brodsky, Richard D. Penn, Mark Stacy, Andres M. Lozano, Robert J. Coffey, Steven S. Gill, Patrick J. Kelly, Burton L. Scott, Vijay Dhawan, James Matcham, Arif Dalvi, Kim J. Burchiel, W. J. Elias, Edward R. Laws, Anthony E. Lang, Michael Traub, Nik K. Patel, V. G. Frederich Wooten
المصدر: Annals of neurology. 59(3)
سنة النشر: 2006
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Time Factors, Placebo, Severity of Illness Index, law.invention, Drug Delivery Systems, Randomized controlled trial, Double-Blind Method, Neurotrophic factors, law, Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, medicine, Clinical endpoint, Humans, Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor, Analysis of Variance, biology, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Putamen, Parkinson Disease, Middle Aged, Recombinant Proteins, Surgery, Dihydroxyphenylalanine, Clinical trial, Treatment Outcome, Neurology, Dyskinesia, Anesthesia, Positron-Emission Tomography, biology.protein, Drug Evaluation, Female, Neurology (clinical), medicine.symptom, Psychology
الوصف: Objective Glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) exerts potent trophic influence on midbrain dopaminergic neurons. This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to confirm initial clinical benefits observed in a small, open-label trial using intraputamenal (Ipu) infusion of recombinant human GDNF (liatermin). Methods Thirty-four PD patients were randomized 1 to 1 to receive bilateral continuous Ipu infusion of liatermin 15μg/putamen/day or placebo. The primary end point was the change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score in the practically defined off condition at 6 months. Secondary end points included other UPDRS scores, motor tests, dyskinesia ratings, patient diaries, and 18F-dopa uptake. Results At 6 months, mean percentage changes in “off” UPDRS motor score were −10.0% and −4.5% in the liatermin and placebo groups, respectively. This treatment difference was not significant (95% confidence interval, −23.0 to 12.0, p = 0.53). Secondary end point results were similar between the groups. A 32.5% treatment difference favoring liatermin in mean 18F-dopa influx constant (p = 0.019) was observed. Serious, device-related adverse events required surgical repositioning of catheters in two patients and removal of devices in another. Neutralizing antiliatermin antibodies were detected in three patients (one on-study and two in the open-label extension). Interpretation Liatermin did not confer the predetermined level of clinical benefit to patients with PD despite increased 18F-dopa uptake. It is uncertain whether technical differences between this trial and positive open-label studies contributed in any way this negative outcome. Ann Neurol 2006
تدمد: 0364-5134
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::96cbe24d73c8f7c182b4f5964646bf34Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16489617Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....96cbe24d73c8f7c182b4f5964646bf34
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE