Strength training versus aerobic interval training to modify risk factors of metabolic syndrome

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Strength training versus aerobic interval training to modify risk factors of metabolic syndrome
المؤلفون: Arnt Erik Tjønna, Eli-Anne Skaug, Stian Thoresen Aspenes, Stig A. Slørdahl, Tomas Stølen, Dorth Stensvold, Ulrik Wisløff
المصدر: Journal of Applied Physiology. 108:804-810
بيانات النشر: American Physiological Society, 2010.
سنة النشر: 2010
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Brachial Artery, Physiology, Strength training, Biology, Muscle, Smooth, Vascular, Interval training, chemistry.chemical_compound, Oxygen Consumption, Risk Factors, Physiology (medical), Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Exercise physiology, Exercise, Adiposity, Ultrasonography, Metabolic Syndrome, Triglyceride, Body Weight, Metabolic disorder, Resistance Training, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Obesity, Body Height, Exercise Therapy, Vasodilation, Endocrinology, chemistry, Basal metabolic rate, Quality of Life, Female, Basal Metabolism, Endothelium, Vascular, Waist Circumference, Metabolic syndrome, Blood Chemical Analysis
الوصف: Metabolic syndrome is characterized by central obesity, elevated blood pressure, high fasting glucose and triglyceride levels, and low HDL levels. Regular physical activity can improve the metabolic profile and reduce the risks of cardiovascular diseases and premature mortality. However, the optimal training regime to treat metabolic syndrome and its associated cardiovascular abnormalities remains undefined. Forty-three participants with metabolic syndrome were randomized to one of the following groups: aerobic interval training (AIT; n = 11), strength training (ST; n = 11), a combination of AIT and ST (COM; n = 10) 3 times/wk for 12 wk, or control ( n = 11). Risk factors comprising metabolic syndrome were evaluated before and after the intervention. Waist circumference (in cm) was significantly reduced after AIT [95% confidence interval (CI): −2.5 to −0.04], COM (95% CI: −2.11 to −0.63), and ST (95% CI: −2.68 to −0.84), whereas the control group had an increase in waist circumference (95% CI: 0.37–2.9). The AIT and COM groups had 11% and 10% increases in peak O2 uptake, respectively. There were 45% and 31% increases in maximal strength after ST and COM, respectively. Endothelial function, measured as flow-mediated dilatation (in %), was improved after AIT (95% CI: 0.3–3), COM (95% CI: 0.3–3), and ST (95% CI: 1.5–4.5). There were no changes in body weight, fasting plasma glucose, or HDL levels within or between the groups. In conclusion, all three training regimes have beneficial effects on physiological abnormalities associated with metabolic syndrome.
تدمد: 1522-1601
8750-7587
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::f3a0278f86492131c47173e1b90f3674Test
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00996.2009Test
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....f3a0278f86492131c47173e1b90f3674
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE