دورية أكاديمية

Azacitidine improves clinical outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia with myelodysplasia-related changes compared with conventional care regimens

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Azacitidine improves clinical outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia with myelodysplasia-related changes compared with conventional care regimens
المؤلفون: Seymour, John F., Döhner, Hartmut, Butrym, Aleksandra, Wierzbowska, Agnieszka, Selleslag, Dominik, Jang, Jun Ho, Kumar, Rajat, Cavenagh, James, Schuh, Andre C., Candoni, Anna, Récher, Christian, Sandhu, Irwindeep, Bernal del Castillo, Teresa, Al-Ali, Haifa Kathrin, Falantes-González, José Francisco, Stone, Richard M., Minden, Mark D., Weaver, Jerry, Songer, Steve, Beach, C. L., Dombret, Hervé
المساهمون: Celgene
بيانات النشر: BioMed Central
سنة النشر: 2017
المجموعة: Digital.CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas / Spanish National Research Council)
مصطلحات موضوعية: Azacitidine, Low-dose cytarabine, Acute myeloid leukemia, AML, Myelodysplasia-related changes, AML‐MRC, Induction chemotherapy, Response, Survival
الوصف: [Background] Compared with World Health Organization-defined acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) not otherwise specified, patients with AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) are generally older and more likely to have poor-risk cytogenetics, leading to poor response and prognosis. More than one-half of all older (≥65 years) patients in the phase 3 AZA-AML-001 trial had newly diagnosed AML-MRC. ; [Methods] We compared clinical outcomes for patients with AML-MRC treated with azacitidine or conventional care regimens (CCR; induction chemotherapy, low-dose cytarabine, or supportive care only) overall and within patient subgroups defined by cytogenetic risk (intermediate or poor) and age (65–74 years or ≥75 years). The same analyses were used to compare azacitidine with low-dose cytarabine in patients who had been preselected to low-dose cytarabine before they were randomized to receive azacitidine or CCR (ie, low-dose cytarabine). ; [Results] Median overall survival was significantly prolonged with azacitidine (n = 129) versus CCR (n = 133): 8.9 versus 4.9 months (hazard ratio 0.74, [95%CI 0.57, 0.97]). Among patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics, median overall survival with azacitidine was 16.4 months, and with CCR was 8.9 months (hazard ratio 0.73 [95%CI 0.48, 1.10]). Median overall survival was significantly improved for patients ages 65–74 years treated with azacitidine compared with those who received CCR (14.2 versus 7.3 months, respectively; hazard ratio 0.64 [95%CI 0.42, 0.97]). Within the subgroup of patients preselected to low-dose cytarabine before randomization, median overall survival with azacitidine was 9.5 months versus 4.6 months with low-dose cytarabine (hazard ratio 0.77 [95%CI 0.55, 1.09]). Within the low-dose cytarabine preselection group, patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics who received azacitidine had a median overall survival of 14.1 months versus 6.4 months with low-dose cytarabine, and patients aged 65–74 years had median survival of 14.9 months versus 5.2 months, ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-2407
العلاقة: Publisher's version; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3803-6Test; Sí; BMC Cancer 17: 852 (2017); http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180217Test; http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006436Test
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3803-6
DOI: 10.13039/100006436
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3803-6Test
https://doi.org/10.13039/100006436Test
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180217Test
حقوق: open
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.ACAF5436
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
تدمد:14712407
DOI:10.1186/s12885-017-3803-6