دورية أكاديمية

Evaluating the Asymmetry of Muscle Activation and Strength in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Evaluating the Asymmetry of Muscle Activation and Strength in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes.
المؤلفون: Santos, Leonardo dos, Aidar, Felipe J., Souza, Rafael Luiz Mesquita, de Matos, Dihogo Gama, Cataldi, Stefania, Greco, Gianpiero, Getirana-Mota, Márcio, Marçal, Anderson Carlos, Souza, Lucio Marques Vieira, Santos, Jymmys Lopes dos, Almeida-Neto, Paulo Francisco de, Cabral, Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco, Badicu, Georgian, Nobari, Hadi, Souza, Raphael Frabrício de
المصدر: European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology & Education (EJIHPE); Sep2023, Vol. 13 Issue 9, p1645-1654, 10p
مصطلحات موضوعية: MUSCLE strength, ATHLETES with disabilities, PECTORALIS muscle, ELITE athletes, STRENGTH training, POWERLIFTING
مستخلص: Background: Strength training is a complex task, as it requires a combination of many variables. In paralympic powerlifting (PP) asymmetries for the evaluation of activation, and static force indicators have been increasingly studied. Objective: To investigate the asymmetries in the strength and muscle activation indicators, before and after a training session of PP athletes. Methodology: Twelve elite athletes from the PP participated in the study, and asymmetry was evaluated through surface electromyography (sEMG) and static strength indicators. Evaluations were made before and after a protocol of five series of five repetitions (5 × 5), with 80% of 1-Maximum Repetition (1RM). Results: In the pectoral muscles, there were differences in the non-dominant limbs between the before and after in the sEMG. There were differences in the pectoralis muscle in the non-dominant limb between moments before (110.75 ± 59.52%) and after (130.53 ± 98.48%, p < 0.001), and there was no difference in triceps activation. In the Maximum Isometric Strength (MIF), there was a difference in the non-dominant limb between before (710.36 ± 129.36) and after (620.27 ± 69.73; p < 0.030). There was a difference before in the dominant (626.89 ± 120.16; 95% CI 550.55–703.24) and non-dominant (710.36 ± 129.36; p = 0.011) limbs. There was no difference in time to MIF. Conclusion: PP athletes showed small levels of asymmetry before and after training, and adaptation to training tends to promote fewer asymmetries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology & Education (EJIHPE) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:21748144
DOI:10.3390/ejihpe13090119