دورية أكاديمية

Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
المؤلفون: Skulstad, Svein Magne, Igland, Jannicke, Johannessen, Ane, Bertelsen, Randi Jacobsen, Lønnebotn, Marianne, Omenaas, Ernst Reidar, Svanes, Cecilie, Real, Francisco Gomez
المصدر: PLoS ONE; 8/4/2017, Vol. 12 Issue 8, p1-12, 12p
مصطلحات موضوعية: MEDICAL registries, CHILDBIRTH, PREGNANCY, REPRODUCTIVE health, PREMATURE labor, CESAREAN section
مستخلص: Studies using mothers’ self-reported information on birth and pregnancy characteristics are common, but the validity of such data is uncertain. We evaluated questionnaire data from the RHINE III study on reproductive health provided by 715 mothers from Bergen, Norway, about their 1629 births between 1967 and 2010, using the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) as gold standard. Validity of dichotomous variables (gender, preterm birth [<37 weeks’ gestation], postterm birth [>42 weeks’ gestation], induction of labour, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, caesarean section, were assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and Cohen’s kappa. Paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots were used to validate birthweight, stratified by mother’s level of education, parity, birth year and child’s asthma status. Child’s gender and caesarean section showed high degree of validity (kappa = 0.99, sensitivity and specificity 100%). Instrumental delivery and extremely preterm birth showed good agreement with sensitivity 75–92%. Preterm birth and induction of labour showed moderate agreement. Post-term delivery was poorly reported. The validity appeared to be independent of recall time over 45 years, and of the child’s asthma status. Maternally reported birth and pregnancy information is feasible and cheap, showed high validity for important birth and pregnancy parameters, and showed similar risk-associations compared to registry data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:19326203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0181794