دورية أكاديمية

An Individual Barrier Enclosure Actively Removing Aerosols for Airborne Isolation: A Vacuum Tent.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: An Individual Barrier Enclosure Actively Removing Aerosols for Airborne Isolation: A Vacuum Tent.
المؤلفون: Vieira, Fernando N., Masy, Veronique, LaRue, Ryan J., Laengert, Scott E., De Lannoy, Charles F., Rodrigues, Antenor, Sklar, Michael C., Lo, Nick, Petrosoniak, Andrew, Rezende-Neto, Joao, Brochard, Laurent J.
المصدر: Respiratory Care; Apr2024, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p395-406, 12p
مصطلحات موضوعية: OXYGEN saturation, CONTINUING education units, INFECTION control, PATIENT safety, HUMAN anatomical models, ERGONOMICS, QUALITATIVE research, RESEARCH funding, AEROSOLS, RESPIRATION, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, ISOLATION (Hospital care), TRACHEA intubation, HIGH-frequency ventilation (Therapy), SIMULATION methods in education, NASAL cannula, PRESSURE breathing, AIRWAY (Anatomy), VACUUM
مصطلحات جغرافية: ONTARIO
مستخلص: BACKGROUND: Aerosol barrier enclosure systems have been designed to prevent airborne contamination, but their safety has been questioned. A vacuum tent was designed with active continuous suctioning to minimize risks of aerosol dispersion. We tested its efficacy, risk of rebreathing, and usability on a bench, in healthy volunteers, and in an ergonomic clinical assessment study. METHODS: First, a manikin with airway connected to a breathing simulator was placed inside the vacuum tent to generate active breathing, cough, and CO2 production; high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was applied in the manikin's nares. Negative pressure was applied in the vacuum tent's apex port using wall suction. Fluorescent microparticles were aerosolized in the vacuum tent for qualitative assessment. To quantify particles inside and around vacuum tent (aerosol retention), an airtight aerosol chamber with aerosolized latex microparticles was used. The vacuum tent was tested on healthy volunteers breathing with and without HFNC. Last, its usability was assessed in 5 subjects by 5 different anesthesiologists for delivery of full anesthesia, including intubation and extubation. RESULTS: The vacuum tent was adjusted until no leak was visualized using fluorescent particles. The efficacy in retaining microparticles was confirmed quantitatively. CO2 accumulation inside the vacuum tent showed an inverse correlation with the suction flow in all conditions (normal breathing and HFNC 30 or 60 L/min) in bench and healthy volunteers. Particle removal efficacy and safe breathing conditions (CO2, temperature) were reached when suctioning was at least 60 L/min or 20 L/min > HFNC flow. Five subjects were successfully intubated and anesthetized without ergonomic difficulties and with minimal interference with workflow and an excellent overall assessment by the anesthesiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The vacuum tent effectively minimized aerosol dispersion. Its continuous suction system set at a high suction flow was crucial to avoid the spread of aerosol particles and CO rebreathing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Respiratory Care is the property of American Association for Respiratory Care and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Supplemental Index
الوصف
تدمد:00201324
DOI:10.4187/respcare.11094