The Use of a Stoma Rod/Bridge to Prevent Retraction: A Systematic Review

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Use of a Stoma Rod/Bridge to Prevent Retraction: A Systematic Review
المؤلفون: Jeremy Meyer, Frédéric Ris, Sotirios Georgios Popeskou, Eleftherios Gialamas, Nicolas C. Buchs, Ziad Abbassi
المصدر: Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 48(1)
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Ostomy, Mucocutaneous zone, MEDLINE, 030230 surgery, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Postoperative Complications, Stoma (medicine), Randomized controlled trial, law, medicine, Irritant dermatitis, Humans, Adverse effect, Prospective cohort study, Advanced and Specialized Nursing, business.industry, Surgical Stomas, Surgery, Medical–Surgical Nursing, surgical procedures, operative, Bridge (graph theory), Treatment Outcome, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Dermatitis, Irritant, business
الوصف: Purpose We evaluated evidence related to the use of a rod (bridge) to prevent stoma retraction during loop ostomy construction. Methods We completed a systematic review of the literature. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases up to December 4, 2019. We posed the following question based on a PICO format. Do adult patients undergoing ostomy surgery experience less stomal retraction when compared to patients managed without placement of a stoma rod? Findings Our initial search returned 182 articles; after reading studies in full, 5 articles were identified that collectively enrolled 1058 participants. Four studies were randomized controlled trials and one was a prospective cohort study. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the small number of studies and the heterogeneity of outcomes measurements. The incidence of stoma retraction ranged between 0%-8% in patients managed with a rod and 0.78%-8.2% in patients with no rod. The number of reported adverse events was low. Placement of a stoma rod was associated with more adverse outcomes than in patients managed without a rod. Adverse events included local edema, stoma necrosis, skin necrosis, peristomal moisture-associated skin damage (irritant dermatitis), peristomal abscess, bleeding, and mucocutaneous separation. Conclusions Stoma rod does not seem to reduce the risk of stoma retraction and might result in other adverse events. Implications We recommend avoidance of stoma rod/bridge placement during ostomy surgery.
تدمد: 1528-3976
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::23809211bf67fa4dc5956581a9c838b7Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33427808Test
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....23809211bf67fa4dc5956581a9c838b7
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE