Gabapentenoids in pain management in urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome: Gabapentin or pregabalin?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Gabapentenoids in pain management in urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome: Gabapentin or pregabalin?
المؤلفون: Mudelin Elsi Sy, Mayank Mohan Agarwal
المصدر: Neurourology and urodynamics. 36(8)
سنة النشر: 2016
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, Gabapentin, Adolescent, Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids, Urology, 030232 urology & nephrology, Pregabalin, Prostatitis, Pelvic Pain, 03 medical and health sciences, Young Adult, 0302 clinical medicine, Lower urinary tract symptoms, medicine, Humans, Pain Management, Amitriptyline, 030212 general & internal medicine, Amines, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Retrospective Studies, Analgesics, business.industry, Pelvic pain, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Perineum, medicine.anatomical_structure, Treatment Outcome, Anesthesia, Neuropathic pain, Neuralgia, Neurology (clinical), medicine.symptom, Chronic Pain, business, medicine.drug
الوصف: AIMS To compare efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin in patients with urological chronic pelvic-pain syndrome (UCPPS). METHODS Design—retrospective, setting—urology outpatient services of a secondary-care private hospital, inclusion criteria—men 18-50 years, presenting with pelvic pain (lower abdomen, groin, scrotum, perineum, low-back, hip) with or without lower urinary tract symptoms for at least 3 months duration. Hospital database was searched using keywords for neuropathic pain (ICD9—729.2, 719.45) and prostatitis (ICD9—601.1, 601.9). Clinical data were retrieved from patient-records, laboratory and radiology data, and analyzed using SPSS-19 statistical software. RESULTS Between Mar 2013 and Oct 2015, data of consecutive 119 patients fulfilling the above criteria was analyzed. Median age of patients was 35 years (IQR 29-43) and median duration of symptoms 12 months (IQR 6-24 months). Before treatment median VAS (0-10) pain score was 5 (IQR 4-6). Gabapentin was significantly more effective in controlling pain compared to pregabalin. Three fourth of patients on gabapentin alone (47/62) reported at least 50% improvement in pain compared to only 40% on pregabalin alone (12/30) (P = 0.0012; χ2 = 9.765. NNT 2.9, 95%CI 1.8-6.5). Twenty patients who were initially put on pregabalin had to switch to gabapentin for lack of efficacy. Forty four percent of patients on pregabalin required amitriptyline (24/54) compared to only 13.6% of those on gabapentin (10/72) required the same (P value of difference 0.0001; χ2 = 14.622. NNT 4, CI 95% 2.2-6.6). CONCLUSIONS Gabapentin may be more effective than pregabalin in UCPPS.
تدمد: 1520-6777
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1669a378451097c2eaf8b55af7eaa0faTest
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28185319Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....1669a378451097c2eaf8b55af7eaa0fa
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE