Strategies for the assessment of competences during rheumatology training across Europe: results of a qualitative study
| العنوان: | Strategies for the assessment of competences during rheumatology training across Europe: results of a qualitative study |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Sofia Ramiro, Francisca Sivera, Brigitte Michelsen, Kim Lauper, Maddalena Larosa, Alexandre Sepriano, Ladislav Šenolt, Alessia Alunno, Paul Studenic, Ana Maria Gherghe, Catherine Haines, Russka Shumnalieva, Aurélie Najm, Cecilia Mercieca, Peter Korsten, Ledio Collaku, Samir Mehmedagić, Ivan Pajen, Tue Kragstrup, Liis Puis, Laura Kuusalo, Claire Daien, Mangel Zsolt, Richard Conway, Mira Merashli, Julija Zepa, Snezana M. Perchinkova, Victoria Sadovici-Bobeica, Marloes von Onna, Olga Brzezińska, Anton Povzun, Ivan Jeremic, Ulrika Ursinyova, Blaž Burja, Diego Benavent, Aikaterina Chatzidionysiou, Yesim Ozguler, Yuzaiful Yusof, Olena Zimba |
| المساهمون: | Lauper, Kim, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation [Glasgow, UK], University of Glasgow, Università degli Studi di Perugia (UNIPG), Universidad Miguel Hernández [Elche] (UMH), Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), King‘s College London |
| المصدر: | RMD Open, 6(2). BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP RMD Open r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica instname RMD Open, Vol. 6, No 2 (2020) RMD Open : Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Diseases RMD Open : Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Diseases, EULAR ; BMJ, 2020, 6 (2), pp.e001183. ⟨10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001183⟩ RMD Open, Vol 6, Iss 2 (2020) Najm, A, Alunno, A, Sivera, F, Ramiro, S, Haines, C & Working Group on Training in Rheumatology across Europe 2020, ' Strategies for the assessment of competences during rheumatology training across Europe : results of a qualitative study ', RMD Open, vol. 6, no. 2 . https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001183Test |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Male, Online discussion, Gout, Epidemiology, lcsh:Medicine, Autoimmunity, 0302 clinical medicine, Sjøgren’s syndrome, Immunology and Allergy, Medicine, 030212 general & internal medicine, MESH: Qualitative Research, Qualitative Research, media_common, ddc:616, Teamwork, Synovitis, Health services research, Focus Groups, Europe, [SDV.MHEP.RSOA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Rhumatology and musculoskeletal system, Sjogren's syndrome, Outcomes research, MESH: Educational Measurement, Female, MESH: Clinical Competence, Clinical Competence, Ankylosing spondylitis, medicine.medical_specialty, media_common.quotation_subject, [SHS.EDU]Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, Immunology, education, Chondrocalcinosis, Early rheumatoid arthritis, Education, Formative assessment, 03 medical and health sciences, Rheumatology, MESH: Rheumatology, Spondyloarthritis, Tcells, Rheumatoid arthritis, Synovial fluid, Treatment, Humans, Quality (business), Sjøgren's syndrome, 030203 arthritis & rheumatology, Medical education, MESH: Humans, business.industry, lcsh:R, Focus group, MESH: Male, MESH: Focus Groups, MESH: Europe, Educational Measurement, business, MESH: Female, Qualitative research |
| الوصف: | ObjectivesTo gain insight into current methods and practices for the assessment of competences during rheumatology training, and to explore the underlying priorities and rationales for competence assessment.MethodsWe used a qualitative approach through online focus groups (FGs) of rheumatology trainers and trainees, separately. The study included five countries—Denmark, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and the United Kingdom. A summary of current practices of assessment of competences was developed, modified and validated by the FGs based on an independent response to a questionnaire. A prioritising method (9 Diamond technique) was then used to identify and justify key assessment priorities.ResultsOverall, 26 participants (12 trainers, 14 trainees) participated in nine online FGs (2 per country, Slovenia 1 joint), totalling 12 hours of online discussion. Strong nationally (the Netherlands, UK) or institutionally (Spain, Slovenia, Denmark) standardised approaches were described. Most groups identified providing frequent formative feedback to trainees for developmental purposes as the highest priority. Most discussions identified a need for improvement, particularly in developing streamlined approaches to portfolios that remain close to clinical practice, protecting time for quality observation and feedback, and adopting systematic approaches to incorporating teamwork and professionalism into assessment systems.ConclusionThis paper presents a clearer picture of the current practice on the assessment of competences in rheumatology in five European countries and the underlying rationale of trainers’ and trainees’ priorities. This work will inform EULAR Points-to-Consider for the assessment of competences in rheumatology training across Europe. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2056-5933 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0278e75b3c7c27559efd3e5460e2c664Test http://hdl.handle.net/1887/3240281Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....0278e75b3c7c27559efd3e5460e2c664 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 20565933 |
|---|