التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Validation of the italian version of the 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality-of-Life questionnaire. |
| المؤلفون: |
Raggi, Alberto1 alberto.raggi@istituto-besta.it, Leonardi, Matilde1, Ayadi, Roberta1, Antozzi, Carlo2, Maggi, Lorenzo2, Baggi, Fulvio2, Mantegazza, Renato2 |
| المصدر: |
Muscle & Nerve. Oct2017, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p716-720. 5p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*MENTAL health, *QUALITY of life, *COMPARATIVE studies, *HEALTH surveys, *LONGITUDINAL method, *RESEARCH methodology, *MEDICAL cooperation, *QUESTIONNAIRES, *MYASTHENIA gravis, *RESEARCH, *TRANSLATIONS, *SURVEYS, *EVALUATION research, *PSYCHOLOGY, *DIAGNOSIS, *STANDARDS |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
ITALY |
| مستخلص: |
Introduction: In this study we assess the Italian version of the 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality-of-Life questionnaire (MG-QOL15).Methods: The validation protocol included the MG-QOL15, the 36-item Short Form (SF-36), the Besta Neurological Institute Rating Scale for Myasthenia Gravis, and the MG-Composite. We used the Cronbach α to test reliability, the Spearman correlation to test short-term test-retest, the Kruskal-Wallis test to assess differences in MG-QOL15 between patients with different disease severity, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess sensitivity to change.Results: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. The mean MG-QOL15 score was 15.2 ± 12.2, with α = 0.93 and test-retest correlation = 0.93. Compared with the SF-36, the MG-QOL15 was superior in differentiating patients with different MG types (P = 0.041) and severity (P = 0.004), showed higher sensitivity to change (P = 0.003 for improved and P = 0.024 for worsened patients), and had higher correlations with the MG-Composite (rho = 0.367 vs. -0.213 and -0.154).Conclusion: The Italian version of the MG-QOL15 is valid, reliable, stable, and sensitive to changes. Muscle Nerve 56: 716-720, 2017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Academic Search Index |
