دورية أكاديمية

Hospital-acquired complications in intensive care unit patients with diabetes: A before-and-after study of a conventional versus liberal glucose control protocol.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Hospital-acquired complications in intensive care unit patients with diabetes: A before-and-after study of a conventional versus liberal glucose control protocol.
المؤلفون: Luethi, Nora, Cioccari, Luca, Eastwood, Glenn, Biesenbach, Peter, Morgan, Rhys, Sprogis, Stephanie, Young, Helen, Peck, Leah, Knee Chong, Christine, Moore, Sandra, Moon, Kylie, Ekinci, Elif I., Deane, Adam M., Bellomo, Rinaldo, Mårtensson, Johan
المصدر: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica; Jul2019, Vol. 63 Issue 6, p761-768, 8p, 3 Charts
مصطلحات موضوعية: INTENSIVE care patients, PEOPLE with diabetes, DISEASE complications, HOSPITAL admission & discharge, GLUCOSE, DIABETES complications, BLOOD sugar analysis, TREATMENT of diabetes, INTENSIVE care units, RESEARCH, RESEARCH methodology, EVALUATION research, MEDICAL cooperation, CATASTROPHIC illness, COMPARATIVE studies, RESEARCH funding, LONGITUDINAL method
مستخلص: Background: Critically ill patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of in-hospital complications and the optimal glycemic target for such patients remains unclear. A more liberal approach to glucose control has recently been suggested for patients with DM, but uncertainty remains regarding its impact on complications.Methods: We aimed to test the hypothesis that complications would be more common with a liberal glycemic target in ICU patients with DM. Thus, we compared hospital-acquired complications in the first 400 critically ill patients with DM included in a sequential before-and-after trial of liberal (glucose target: 10-14 mmol/L) vs conventional (glucose target: 6-10 mmol/L) glucose control.Results: Of the 400 patients studied, 165 (82.5%) patients in the liberal and 177 (88.5%) in the conventional-control group were coded for at least one hospital-acquired complication (P = 0.09). When comparing clinically relevant complications diagnosed between ICU admission and hospital discharge, we found no difference in the odds for infectious (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for liberal-control: 1.15 [95% CI: 0.68-1.96], P = 0.60), cardiovascular (aOR 1.40 [95% CI: 0.63-3.12], P = 0.41) or neurological complications (aOR: 1.07 [95% CI: 0.61-1.86], P = 0.81), acute kidney injury (aOR 0.83 [95% CI: 0.43-1.58], P = 0.56) or hospital mortality (aOR: 1.09 [95% CI: 0.59-2.02], P = 0.77) between the liberal and the conventional-control group.Conclusion: In this prospective before-and-after study, liberal glucose control was not associated with an increased risk of hospital-acquired infectious, cardiovascular, renal or neurological complications in critically ill patients with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00015172
DOI:10.1111/aas.13354