دورية أكاديمية
Comparison between Three‐Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial
| العنوان: | Comparison between Three‐Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Zhipeng Deng, Qiang Zou, Lei Wang, Liang Wang, Peng Xiu, Ganjun Feng, Yueming Song, Xi Yang |
| المصدر: | Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol 15, Iss 11, Pp 2889-2900 (2023) |
| بيانات النشر: | Wiley, 2023. |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Orthopedic surgery |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | 3D Printed Titanium (3DPT) Cage, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage, Spinal Degenerative Disorders, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF), Orthopedic surgery, RD701-811 |
| الوصف: | Objectives The three‐dimensional printing titanium (3DPT) cage with excellent biomechanical properties and osseointegration capabilities has been initially used in spinal fusion, while the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage, a bioinert material device, has been a widely used for decades with relatively excellent clinical outcomes. This study was performed to investigate the early radiographic and clinical outcomes of 3DPT cage versus PEEK cage in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods This prospective controlled trial, from December 2019 to June 2022, included patients undergoing ACDF and TLIF with 3DPT cages and compared them to patients using PEEK cages for treating spinal degenerative disorders. The outcome measures included radiographic parameters (intervertebral height [IH], subsidence, fusion status, and bone‐cage interface contact) and clinical outcomes (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA], Neck Disability Index [NDI], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Short Form 12‐Item Survey [SF‐12], Visual Analog Scale [VAS], and Odom's criteria). Student's independent samples t test and Pearson's chi‐square test were used to compare the outcome measures between the two groups before surgery and at 1 week, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Results For the patients undergoing ACDF, the 3DPT (18 patients/[26 segments]) and PEEK groups (18 patients/[26 segments]) had similar fusion rates at 3 months and 6 months follow‐up (3 months: 96.2% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.182; 6 months: 100% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.225). The subsidence in the 3DPT group was significantly lower than that in the PEEK group (3 months: 0.4 ± 0.2 mm vs. 0.9 ± 0.7 mm p = 0.004; 6 months: 0.7 ± 0.3 mm vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 mm, p |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1757-7861 1757-7853 |
| العلاقة: | https://doaj.org/toc/1757-7853Test; https://doaj.org/toc/1757-7861Test |
| DOI: | 10.1111/os.13896 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://doaj.org/article/7da06b43f683410ba36cf9e0c914d87eTest |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.7da06b43f683410ba36cf9e0c914d87e |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 17577861 17577853 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1111/os.13896 |