دورية أكاديمية

Arthroscopic Modified Double‐Row Biceps Tenodesis versus Labral Repair for the Treatment of Isolated Type II SLAP Lesions in Non‐Overhead Athletes

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Arthroscopic Modified Double‐Row Biceps Tenodesis versus Labral Repair for the Treatment of Isolated Type II SLAP Lesions in Non‐Overhead Athletes
المؤلفون: Yu Song, Zhong Wu, Miao Wang, Shengfu Liu, Ruijun Cong, Kun Tao
المصدر: Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol 14, Iss 7, Pp 1340-1349 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Wiley, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Orthopedic surgery
مصطلحات موضوعية: biceps sheath, complication, labral repair, modified double‐row biceps tenodesis, superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions, Orthopedic surgery, RD701-811
الوصف: Abstract Objective To evaluate the postoperative efficacy and the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic modified double‐row biceps tenodesis versus labral repair. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 56 patients with isolated type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions from March 2015 to November 2018. Thirty patients (male:female = 17:13) were treated with labral repair, and 26 patients (male:female = 15:11) were treated with modified double‐row biceps tenodesis. The average age of the labral repair group and the modified double‐row biceps tenodesis group were 42.8 ± 10.6 and 40.9 ± 10.2 years, respectively. Pre‐ and postoperative assessments with the visual analog scale (VAS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were compared between the two treatment groups. Additional outcome measures included patient satisfaction, the time to return to previous activities, workers' compensation status, and postoperative complications. Results At a 2‐year follow‐up, the tenodesis group showed significant differences in postoperative VAS (1.5 to 1.8, respectively; p = 0.008), patient satisfaction (92.3% vs. 46.7%, p
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1757-7861
1757-7853
العلاقة: https://doaj.org/toc/1757-7853Test; https://doaj.org/toc/1757-7861Test
DOI: 10.1111/os.13229
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/b8ac0b7266374e3f8cc166e052579750Test
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.b8ac0b7266374e3f8cc166e052579750
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:17577861
17577853
DOI:10.1111/os.13229