دورية أكاديمية

Comparison between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
المؤلفون: Firouzi, Ata, Kazem Moussavi, Ali, Mohebbi, Ahmad, Alemzadeh-Ansari, Mohammad Javad, Kiani, Reza, Sanati, Hamid Reza, Mohebbi, Bahram, Shakerian, Farshad, Zahedmehr, Ali, Ansari-Ramandi, Mohammad Mostafa, Oni Heris, Saeed, Ghaleshi, Bahar, Ghorbani, Fatemeh
المصدر: Journal of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Research; 2018, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p149-152, 4p
مصطلحات موضوعية: KIDNEY disease prevention, PREVENTION of surgical complications, CREATININE, HEALTH facilities, HOSPITAL admission & discharge, KIDNEY diseases, MYOCARDIAL infarction, PATIENTS, STATISTICAL sampling, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, TREATMENT effectiveness, DISEASE incidence, CONTRAST media, BLIND experiment, ATORVASTATIN, PERCUTANEOUS coronary intervention, ROSUVASTATIN, THERAPEUTICS
مستخلص: Introduction: There is some controversy over the efficacy of statins for the prevention of contrastinduced nephropathy (CIN). There have also been reports on varying efficacies of different statins. Hence, in this study the efficacy of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin for the prevention of CIN was assessed. Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed on 495 random patients with myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a training referral hospital in 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either atorvastatin 80 mg at admission and daily or rosuvastatin 40 mg at admission and daily. CIN was defined based on serum creatinine elevation after 48 hours from the PCI. Results: The incidence of CIN was observed in 63 patients (21.4%) After 48 hours from primary PCI. Of those, 17% (n = 50) were grade 1 CIN, while 4.4% (n = 13) were grade 2 CIN. There was no significant difference between rosuvastatin group compared with atorvastatin group, regarding the CIN grading (P = 0.14). Conclusion: Our results indicate that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin have similar efficacy for the prevention of CIN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Research is the property of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:20085117
DOI:10.15171/jcvtr.2018.24