Methodological considerations in using patient reported measures in dialysis clinics
| العنوان: | Methodological considerations in using patient reported measures in dialysis clinics |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | John D. Peipert, Ron D. Hays |
| المصدر: | Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2017) Peipert, JD; & Hays, RD. (2017). Methodological considerations in using patient reported measures in dialysis clinics.. Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 1(1), 11. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0010-9. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1k32q900Test Journal of patient-reported outcomes, vol 1, iss 1 Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
| بيانات النشر: | SpringerOpen, 2017. |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | medicine.medical_specialty, Quality management, medicine.medical_treatment, 030232 urology & nephrology, Health Informatics, Outcomes, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Quality of life (healthcare), Health Information Management, Health care, medicine, Patient reported measures, 030212 general & internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, Dialysis, Reimbursement, business.industry, lcsh:Public aspects of medicine, lcsh:RA1-1270, medicine.disease, Commentary, Hemodialysis, business, Medicaid, Kidney disease |
| الوصف: | Patient reported measures (PRMs), including patient-reported outcomes, play a critical role in dialysis care. The usage of PRMs is extensive in dialysis clinics. While there are excellent PRMs to choose from, and their implementation as part of quality improvement and performance monitoring is extensive, there are still methodological challenges to be addressed. In this paper, we identify key methodological concerns around use of PRMs in dialysis centers in the United States and make recommendations for improving the use of PRMs in dialysis related to Selection of PRMs, Mode of Administration, and Support for PRM Use. These recommendations include: (1) Continue the use of Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item survey (KDQOL™-36) for dialysis centers’ internal quality improvement activities and the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS survey®) for public dialysis center performance monitoring, but promote efforts to modify these instruments by incorporating PROMIS general health items (KDQOL-36) and reducing the length of the ICH-CAHPS. (2) Adopt a PRM of whether dialysis patients have been informed about all dialysis and transplant options. (3) Evaluate equivalence between electronic and paper versions of PRMs prior to widespread use of electronic administration. (4) Explore reimbursement of costs of PRM administration by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and kidney organizations. (5) Continue development of provider trainings in PRM administration and interpretation. These recommendations will help dialysis care decision-makers, clinicians, and applied researchers take the next steps toward enhancing PRM use in dialysis. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2509-8020 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::957ed7e16b4620a67f2bba7d21b017a4Test http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-017-0010-9Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....957ed7e16b4620a67f2bba7d21b017a4 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 25098020 |
|---|