دورية أكاديمية
Evaluating a process of academic detailing in primary care: an educational programme for acute kidney injury
| العنوان: | Evaluating a process of academic detailing in primary care: an educational programme for acute kidney injury |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Noble, Rebecca A., McKinnell, Joanna C., Shaw, Sue, Bassett, Sally, Woods, Lynn, Asrar, Mufaza, Kolhe, Nitin V., Selby, Nicholas M. |
| بيانات النشر: | Springer Verlag |
| سنة النشر: | 2019 |
| المجموعة: | University of Nottingham: Repository@Nottingham |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | AKI, Primary care, Academic detailing, Peer-review, Nephrology |
| الوصف: | BackgroundPrimary care has a significant role in AKI management: two-thirds of AKI originates in the community. Through academic detailing (an evidence-based educational approach) we aimed to implement and measure the effect of a primary care-based education programme based around academic detailing and peer-reviewed audit.MethodsThe education programme took place across a large clinical commissioning group (CCG) consisting of 55 primary care practices. All 55 practices participated in large group teaching sessions, 25 practices participated in academic detailing and 28 of the remaining 30 practices performed internal AKI audit. Over a 12 month period, an educational programme was delivered consisting of large group teaching sessions followed by either academic detailing sessions or self-directed AKI audit activity. Academic detailing sessions consisted of a short presentation by a consultant nephrologist followed by discussion of cases. Qualitative feedback was collected from all participants at peer review sessions. Web-based, CCG-wide questionnaires assessed baseline and post-intervention knowledge levels.ResultsNine hundred ninety-six individuals completed the questionnaires (556 at baseline, 440 at 1 yr., 288 participated in both). Exposure to AKI teaching, self-reported awareness and confidence levels were higher in the second questionnaire. There was a significant increase in the percentage of correct answers before and after the intervention (55.6 ± 21% versus 87.5 ± 20%, p |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | unknown |
| العلاقة: | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2293391Test; BMC Medical Education; Volume 19; https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/file/2293391/1/Evaluating%20a%20processTest |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12909-019-1659-y |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1659-yTest https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/file/2293391/1/Evaluating%20a%20processTest https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2293391Test |
| حقوق: | openAccess ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test/ |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.C2AD6829 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12909-019-1659-y |
|---|