التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Focus on the need or feeling good? Coping through instrumental action versus prohedonic distraction depends on the temporal efficacy of means. |
| المؤلفون: |
Salerno, Anthony, Janiszewski, Chris, Laran, Juliano |
| المصدر: |
Motivation & Emotion; Dec2023, Vol. 47 Issue 6, p887-907, 21p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
SADNESS, AFFECT (Psychology), EMOTIONS, DISTRACTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL distress |
| مستخلص: |
Stressors (e.g., a dangerous environment) that create a need (e.g., a need for safety) can also elicit negative emotions (e.g., fear, distress, and sadness) and different strategies for coping with them. Subsequently, the types of coping strategies a person can employ either address (1) the source of the negative emotions (i.e., the need) or (2) the consequences of the negative emotions (i.e., the negative affective state). We hypothesized that the temporal efficacy of need-based actions determines when each type of coping strategy is pursued. Negative emotions encourage a person to address the need when the available need-based actions are efficacious (i.e., they meet the need) in the present (i.e., they meet the need soon after acquisition or usage). Negative emotions encourage a person to prioritize the negative affective state when the available need-based actions are efficacious in the future or have delayed availability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Motivation & Emotion is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
