Topiramate in the Treatment of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Systematic Review with Individual Patient Data Analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Topiramate in the Treatment of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Systematic Review with Individual Patient Data Analysis
المؤلفون: Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Eugen Trinka, Stanley C. Igwe, Raffaele Nardone, Francesco Brigo
المصدر: Drugs
بيانات النشر: Springer Nature
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Topiramate, Pediatrics, medicine.medical_specialty, topiramate, super-refractory status epilepticus, Fructose, Status epilepticus, 03 medical and health sciences, High morbidity, 0302 clinical medicine, Pharmacotherapy, Intervention (counseling), medicine, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), status epilepticus, treatment, 030212 general & internal medicine, Convulsive status epilepticus, Seizure types, business.industry, Patient data, nervous system diseases, nervous system, Anesthesia, Anticonvulsants, Systematic Review, medicine.symptom, business, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, medicine.drug
الوصف: Background Generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a medical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality that requires prompt medical intervention. Topiramate (TPM) is an antiepileptic drug effective against a broad spectrum of seizure types, and has been proposed as a possible therapeutic option for super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), the most severe form of GCSE. Aim This review aimed to evaluate the role of TPM in GCSE, including SRSE. Methods MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, LILACS, Google Scholar, and Opengrey.eu were systematically searched. We compared: (1) patients who did and who did not receive TPM as their last drug; (2) patients receiving TPM as the last drug and achieving SE control and patients receiving TPM as the last drug but without termination of SE. Results The literature search yielded 1164 results, with individual data available for 35 patients (six with SRSE) from four studies. SE was controlled in 68.6% of patients receiving TPM either as the last drug (20) or not (15), and in 14 of the 20 patients receiving TPM as the last drug (70%). Only six patients received TPM for SRSE; in five of them, TPM was administered as the last drug with resolution of SE in four. When comparing patients who did and did not receive TPM as the last drug, no statistically significant difference was found for any of the variables considered; similarly, no difference was found comparing patients receiving TPM as the last drug and achieving SE control with those receiving TPM as the last drug but without termination of SE. Conclusions The lack of a statistically significant difference is likely to be due to the small sample size. In only a few patients was TPM used for SRSE. There is an unmet need for high-quality studies to evaluate the role of TPM in GCSE. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40265-016-0672-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0012-6667
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-016-0672-2
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::74ea65adc1064ca8cb599ee9016e2251Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....74ea65adc1064ca8cb599ee9016e2251
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:00126667
DOI:10.1007/s40265-016-0672-2