The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial
المؤلفون: Ulrike Schierloh, Tadej Battelino, Ignacio Conget, I. Schütz-Fuhrmann, R. Hoogma, Eva Hommel, N. Sulli, Jan Bolinder, Birgitte B. Olsen
المصدر: Diabetologia
بيانات النشر: Springer Nature
مصطلحات موضوعية: Insulin pump, Adult, Blood Glucose, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, endocrine system diseases, Adolescent, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Continuous glucose monitoring, Diabetes mellitus type 1, Glycaemic control, Insulin pump therapy, Randomised controlled trial, Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy, Aged, Biosensing Techniques, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Child, Cross-Over Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Treatment Outcome, Insulin Infusion Systems, Internal Medicine, Article, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, law, Internal medicine, Diabetes mellitus, medicine, Intensive care medicine, Type 1 diabetes, business.industry, medicine.disease, Crossover study, Multicenter study, business
الوصف: Aims/hypothesis The aim of this multicentre, randomised, controlled crossover study was to determine the efficacy of adding continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to insulin pump therapy (CSII) in type 1 diabetes. Methods Children and adults (n = 153) on CSII with HbA1c 7.5–9.5% (58.5–80.3 mmol/mol) were randomised to (CGM) a Sensor On or Sensor Off arm for 6 months. After 4 months’ washout, participants crossed over to the other arm for 6 months. Paediatric and adult participants were separately electronically randomised through the case report form according to a predefined randomisation sequence in eight secondary and tertiary centres. The primary outcome was the difference in HbA1c levels between arms after 6 months. Results Seventy-seven participants were randomised to the On/Off sequence and 76 to the Off/On sequence; all were included in the primary analysis. The mean difference in HbA1c was –0.43% (–4.74 mmol/mol) in favour of the Sensor On arm (8.04% [64.34 mmol/mol] vs 8.47% [69.08 mmol/mol]; 95% CI −0.32%, −0.55% [−3.50, −6.01 mmol/mol]; p
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0012-186X
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-012-2708-9
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::65fa51036290f59376dd6278dffc3a12Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....65fa51036290f59376dd6278dffc3a12
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:0012186X
DOI:10.1007/s00125-012-2708-9