التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy. |
| المؤلفون: |
Deniffel, Dominik1,2,3, Perlis, Nathan4, Ghai, Sangeet3, Girgis, Stephanie5, Healy, Gerard M.2,3, Fleshner, Neil4, Hamilton, Robert4, Kulkarni, Girish4, Toi, Ants3, van der Kwast, Theodorus6, Zlotta, Alexandre4,7, Finelli, Antonio4, Haider, Masoom A.2,3 mahaider@radfiler.com |
| المصدر: |
European Radiology. Nov2022, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p7544-7554. 11p. 1 Illustration, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*PROSTATE biopsy, *MAGNETIC resonance imaging, *PROSTATE cancer, *DECISION making, *RISK assessment |
| مستخلص: |
Objectives: We aimed to develop and compare strategies that help optimize current prostate biopsy practice by identifying patients who may forgo concurrent systematic biopsy (SBx) in favor of MRI–targeted (TBx) alone. Methods: Retrospective study on 745 patients who underwent combined MRI-TBx plus SBx. Primary outcome was the upgrade to clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; grade group ≥ 2) on SBx versus MRI-TBx. Variables (age, previous biopsy status, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, index lesion size/location, number of lesions, PSA, PSA density, prostate volume) associated with the primary outcome were identified by logistic regression and used for biopsy strategies. Clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: SBx detected 47 (6%) additional men with csPCa. The risk of detecting csPCa uniquely on SBx was significantly lower in men with PI-RADS 5 (versus PI-RADS 3: OR 0.30, p = 0.03; versus PI-RADS 4: OR 0.33, p = 0.01), and previous negative biopsy (versus previous positive biopsy: OR 0.40, p = 0.007), and increased with age (per 10 years: OR 1.64, p = 0.016). No significant association was observed for other variables. DCA identified the following strategies as most useful: (a) avoid SBx in men with PI-RADS 5 and (b) additionally in those with previous negative biopsy, resulting in avoiding SBx in 201 (27%) and 429 (58%), while missing csPCa in 5 (1%) and 15 (2%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: Not all men benefit equally from the combination of SBx and MRI-TBx. SBx avoidance in men with PI-RADS 5 and/or previous negative biopsy may reduce the risk of excess biopsies with a low risk of missing csPCa. Key Points: • In men undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy, the risk of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) only on additional systematic biopsy (SBx) decreased in men with PI-RADS 5, previous negative biopsy, and younger age. • Using these variables may help select men who could avoid the risk of excess SBx. • If missing csPCa in 5% was acceptable, forgoing SBx in men with PI-RADS 5 and/or previous negative biopsy enabled the highest net reduction in SBx. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Academic Search Index |
