التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Application of the Staged Approach for Rehabilitation Classification System and Associated Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Rehabilitation for Shoulder Pain. |
| المؤلفون: |
Podschun, Laura1 laura.podschun@ahu.edu, Hill, Cheryl2, Kolber, Morey J2, McClure, Philip3 |
| المصدر: |
PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal. May2024, Vol. 104 Issue 5, p1-9. 9p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*SHOULDER pain, *PAIN measurement, *PHYSICAL therapy, *SCALE analysis (Psychology), *RESEARCH funding, *PATIENTS, *T-test (Statistics), *QUESTIONNAIRES, *EVALUATION of medical care, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *CHI-squared test, *RETROSPECTIVE studies, *CLASSIFICATION, *HEALTH outcome assessment, *COMPARATIVE studies, *CONFIDENCE intervals, *DATA analysis software, *INTER-observer reliability |
| مستخلص: |
Objective The Staged Approach for Rehabilitation Classification for the Shoulder (STAR-Shoulder) has been proposed as a model to guide management and improve outcomes for patients with shoulder pain; however, the effect of its utilization on patient outcomes has not been established. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to determine whether patient outcomes were improved if care was matched to the STAR-Shoulder system compared with unmatched care. Methods Collected and reviewed demographic, examination, and intervention data for all patients receiving physical therapist treatment for shoulder pain during a 1-year period within a single health care system. Outcome variables included the numeric pain rating scale, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the number of visits. Clinical records from patients receiving care at the discretion of the therapist were systematically audited to determine whether care provided was considered matched or unmatched. Results A total of 692 patient records were examined. The interrater reliability of classifying care as matched or unmatched was substantial (κ = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4 to 0.9), with 82% agreement. Changes in patient outcome scores were significantly better for those patients whose care matched the STAR-Shoulder system for pain changes (mean difference = −1.2; 95% CI = 0.8 to 1.6; effect size [ d ] = 0.5) and QuickDASH score (mean difference = 12.7; 95% CI = 9.9 to 15.5; d = 0.7). No difference was noted for number of visits. Conclusion The STAR-Shoulder system appears to be a meaningful way to classify patients and guide intervention to improve patient outcomes. Impact Application of the STAR-Shoulder system to help align physical therapist interventions more closely with tissue irritability and physical impairments appears to improve patient outcomes. These findings support this model as a promising approach to advance evidence-based practice for shoulder pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Academic Search Index |
