دورية أكاديمية

The MC1R r allele does not increase melanoma risk in MITF E318K carriers.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The MC1R r allele does not increase melanoma risk in MITF E318K carriers.
المؤلفون: Wallingford, Courtney K, Demeshko, Anastassia, Krishnakripa, Asha Krishnankutty, Smit, Darren J, Duffy, David L, Betz-Stablein, Brigid, Pflugfelder, Annette, Jagirdar, Kasturee, Holland, Elizabeth, Mann, Graham J, Primiero, Clare A, Yanes, Tatiane, Malvehy, Josep, Badenas, Cèlia, Carrera, Cristina, Aguilera, Paula, Olsen, Catherine M, Ward, Sarah V, Haass, Nikolas K, Sturm, Richard A
المصدر: British Journal of Dermatology; Jun2023, Vol. 188 Issue 6, p770-776, 7p
مصطلحات موضوعية: MICROPHTHALMIA-associated transcription factor, GENOMICS, ALLELES, MELANOMA
مصطلحات جغرافية: UNITED Kingdom
مستخلص: Background Population-wide screening for melanoma is not cost-effective, but genetic characterization could facilitate risk stratification and targeted screening. Common Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) red hair colour (RHC) variants and Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) E318K separately confer moderate melanoma susceptibility, but their interactive effects are relatively unexplored. Objectives To evaluate whether MC1R genotypes differentially affect melanoma risk in MITF E318K+ vs. E318K individuals. Materials and methods Melanoma status (affected or unaffected) and genotype data (MC1R and MITF E318K) were collated from research cohorts (five Australian and two European). In addition, RHC genotypes from E318K+ individuals with and without melanoma were extracted from databases (The Cancer Genome Atlas and Medical Genome Research Bank, respectively). χ 2 and logistic regression were used to evaluate RHC allele and genotype frequencies within E318K+/– cohorts depending on melanoma status. Replication analysis was conducted on 200 000 general-population exomes (UK Biobank). Results The cohort comprised 1165 MITF E318K and 322 E318K+ individuals. In E318K cases MC1R R and r alleles increased melanoma risk relative to wild type (wt), P < 0.001 for both. Similarly, each MC1R RHC genotype (R/R, R/r, R/wt, r/r and r/wt) increased melanoma risk relative to wt/wt (P < 0.001 for all). In E318K+ cases, R alleles increased melanoma risk relative to the wt allele [odds ratio (OR) 2.04 (95% confidence interval 1.67–2.49); P = 0.01], while the r allele risk was comparable with the wt allele [OR 0.78 (0.54–1.14) vs. 1.00, respectively]. E318K+ cases with the r/r genotype had a lower but not significant melanoma risk relative to wt/wt [OR 0.52 (0.20–1.38)]. Within the E318K+ cohort, R genotypes (R/R, R/r and R/wt) conferred a significantly higher risk compared with non-R genotypes (r/r, r/wt and wt/wt) (P < 0.001). UK Biobank data supported our findings that r did not increase melanoma risk in E318K+ individuals. Conclusions RHC alleles/genotypes modify melanoma risk differently in MITF E318K and E318K+ individuals. Specifically, although all RHC alleles increase risk relative to wt in E318K individuals, only MC1R R increases melanoma risk in E318K+ individuals. Importantly, in the E318K+ cohort the MC1R r allele risk is comparable with wt. These findings could inform counselling and management for MITF E318K+ individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Dermatology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00070963
DOI:10.1093/bjd/ljad041