دورية أكاديمية

Long-Term Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tivozanib: Analysis of the Phase III TIVO-3 Trial.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Long-Term Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tivozanib: Analysis of the Phase III TIVO-3 Trial.
المؤلفون: Beckermann, Kathryn E, Asnis-Alibozek, Aviva G, Atkins, Michael B, Escudier, Bernard, Hutson, Thomas E, Kasturi, Vijay, McDermott, David F, Pal, Sumanta K, Porta, Camillo, Rini, Brian I, Verzoni, Elena
المصدر: Oncologist; Mar2024, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p254-262, 9p
مصطلحات موضوعية: RENAL cell carcinoma, STATISTICS, RESEARCH, CONFIDENCE intervals, CANCER relapse, PROTEIN-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TREATMENT effectiveness, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, COMPARATIVE studies, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, SORAFENIB, RESEARCH funding, VASCULAR endothelial growth factors, STATISTICAL sampling, PROGRESSION-free survival, DATA analysis, OVERALL survival, PATIENT safety, LONGITUDINAL method
مستخلص: Background Tivozanib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Long-term exploratory analyses from the TIVO-3 trial in relapsed/refractory (R/R) RCC including patients (26%) with prior immuno-oncology (IO) therapy are reported. Methods Patients with R/R advanced RCC that progressed with 2 or 3 prior systemic therapies (≥1 VEGFR TKI) were randomized to tivozanib 1.5 mg QD or sorafenib 400 mg BID, stratified by IMDC risk and previous therapy. Safety, investigator-assessed long-term progression-free survival (LT-PFS), and serial overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results Mean time on treatment was 11.0 months with tivozanib (n  = 175) and 6.3 months with sorafenib (n  = 175). Fewer grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred with tivozanib (46%) than sorafenib (55%). Dose modification rates were lower with tivozanib than sorafenib across age/prior IO subgroups; prior IO therapy did not impact dose reductions or discontinuations in either arm. Landmark LT-PFS rates were higher with tivozanib (3 years: 12.3% vs 2.4%; 4 years: 7.6% vs 0%). After 22.8 months mean follow-up, the OS HR was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.70-1.14); when conditioned on 12-month landmark PFS, tivozanib showed significant OS improvement over sorafenib (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91; 2-sided P  = .0221). Conclusions Tivozanib demonstrated a consistent safety profile and long-term survival benefit in patients with R/R advanced RCC who were alive and progression free at 12 months. These post hoc exploratory analyses of LT-PFS and conditional OS support a clinically meaningful improvement with tivozanib versus sorafenib in this advanced RCC population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Oncologist is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:10837159
DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyad348