Comparison of single-nucleotide variants identified by Illumina and Oxford Nanopore technologies in the context of a potential outbreak of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of single-nucleotide variants identified by Illumina and Oxford Nanopore technologies in the context of a potential outbreak of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli
المؤلفون: Saheer E. Gharbia, David R. Greig, Claire Jenkins, Timothy J. Dallman
المصدر: GigaScience
بيانات النشر: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Genotype, Health Informatics, Computational biology, Biology, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome, Disease Outbreaks, Workflow, Nanopores, 03 medical and health sciences, Illumina, Humans, Nanotechnology, Typing, Alleles, Escherichia coli Infections, Phylogeny, 030304 developmental biology, 0303 health sciences, outbreak, Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli, Phylogenetic tree, variant calling, 030306 microbiology, Research, Computational Biology, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Shiga toxin, Genomics, DNA extraction, Subtyping, Computer Science Applications, STEC, Oxford Nanopore, Minion, biology.protein, Nanopore sequencing, Genome, Bacterial
الوصف: Background We aimed to compare Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technology sequencing data from the 2 isolates of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 to determine whether concordant single-nucleotide variants were identified and whether inference of relatedness was consistent with the 2 technologies. Results For the Illumina workflow, the time from DNA extraction to availability of results was ∼40 hours, whereas with the ONT workflow serotyping and Shiga toxin subtyping variant identification were available within 7 hours. After optimization of the ONT variant filtering, on average 95% of the discrepant positions between the technologies were accounted for by methylated positions found in the described 5-methylcytosine motif sequences, CC(A/T)GG. Of the few discrepant variants (6 and 7 difference for the 2 isolates) identified by the 2 technologies, it is likely that both methodologies contain false calls. Conclusions Despite these discrepancies, Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technology sequences from the same case were placed on the same phylogenetic location against a dense reference database of STEC O157:H7 genomes sequenced using the Illumina workflow. Robust single-nucleotide polymorphism typing using MinION-based variant calling is possible, and we provide evidence that the 2 technologies can be used interchangeably to type STEC O157:H7 in a public health setting.
تدمد: 2047-217X
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::38e9dafe3bdcd558d45d2a456a4d1444Test
https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz104Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....38e9dafe3bdcd558d45d2a456a4d1444
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE