Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for Patients With Long Coronary Artery Disease

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for Patients With Long Coronary Artery Disease
المؤلفون: Si Wan Choi, Hyun-Sook Kim, Seung-Whan Lee, Jae Ki Ko, Jae-Hwan Lee, June Hong Kim, Seung-Jung Park, Nae Hee Lee, Sung Cheol Yun, Jae Hyeong Park, Kook Jin Chun, Duk-Woo Park, Yoon Haeng Cho, Seong Wook Park, Young-Hak Kim, Myeong Ki Hong, Cheol Whan Lee, In Whan Seong
المصدر: Circulation. 114:2148-2153
بيانات النشر: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2006.
سنة النشر: 2006
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Paclitaxel, medicine.medical_treatment, Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Restenosis, Coronary artery disease, Lesion, Drug Delivery Systems, Restenosis, Physiology (medical), Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Prospective cohort study, Aged, Sirolimus, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Incidence, Stent, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Treatment Outcome, Relative risk, Retreatment, Angiography, Cardiology, Female, medicine.symptom, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, Follow-Up Studies, medicine.drug
الوصف: Background— Outcomes remain relatively unfavorable for stent-based coronary intervention of lesions with long diseased segments. This study compared sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for long coronary lesions. Methods and Results— The present randomized, multicenter, prospective study compared the use of long (≥32 mm) SES with PES in 500 patients with long (≥25 mm) native coronary lesions. The primary end point of the trial was the rate of binary in-segment restenosis according to follow-up angiography at 6 months. The SES and PES groups had similar baseline characteristics. Lesion length was 33.9±11.6 mm in the SES group and 34.5±12.6 mm in the PES group ( P =0.527). The in-segment binary restenosis rate was significantly lower in the SES group than in the PES group (3.3% versus 14.6%; relative risk 0.23; P P P =0.031). Consequently, SES patients had a lower rate of target-lesion revascularization at 9 months (2.4% versus 7.2%, P =0.012). The incidence of death (0.8% in SES versus 0% in PES, P =0.499) or myocardial infarction (8.8% in SES versus 10.8% in PES, P =0.452) at 9 months of follow-up was not statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusions— For patients with long native coronary artery disease, SES implantation was associated with a reduced incidence of angiographic restenosis and a reduced need for target-lesion revascularization compared with PES implantation.
تدمد: 1524-4539
0009-7322
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ed08b139c0cdd85b47b20578499ccf28Test
https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.666396Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....ed08b139c0cdd85b47b20578499ccf28
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE