Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Glucose Sensor during Aerobic, Resistance, and Interval Exercise in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
| العنوان: | Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Glucose Sensor during Aerobic, Resistance, and Interval Exercise in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Virginia Gabo, Jessica R. Castle, Peter G. Jacobs, Katrina Ramsey, Nichole S. Tyler, Leah M. Wilson, Florian H. Guillot, Deborah Branigan, Joseph El Youssef, Michael C. Riddell |
| المصدر: | Biosensors Volume 10 Issue 10 Biosensors, Vol 10, Iss 138, p 138 (2020) |
| بيانات النشر: | MDPI, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Blood Glucose, medicine.medical_specialty, type 1 diabetes, lcsh:Biotechnology, Clinical Biochemistry, high intensity interval training, 030209 endocrinology & metabolism, Article, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Internal medicine, lcsh:TP248.13-248.65, Medicine, Aerobic exercise, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, Type 1 diabetes, exercise, Continuous glucose monitoring, business.industry, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Resistance training, General Medicine, medicine.disease, aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Calibration, Cardiology, glucose sensor accuracy, continuous glucose monitoring, business, High-intensity interval training |
| الوصف: | The accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors may be significantly impacted by exercise. We evaluated the impact of three different types of exercise on the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 sensor. Twenty-four adults with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections wore a G6 sensor. Participants were randomized to aerobic, resistance, or high intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise. Each participant completed two in-clinic 30-min exercise sessions. The sensors were applied on average 5.3 days prior to the in-clinic visits (range 0.6&ndash 9.9). Capillary blood glucose (CBG) measurements with a Contour Next meter were performed before and after exercise as well as every 10 min during exercise. No CGM calibrations were performed. The median absolute relative difference (MARD) and median relative difference (MRD) of the CGM as compared with the reference CBG did not differ significantly from the start of exercise to the end exercise across all exercise types (ranges for aerobic MARD: 8.9 to 13.9% and MRD: &minus 6.4 to 0.5%, resistance MARD: 7.7 to 14.5% and MRD: &minus 8.3 to &minus 2.9%, HIIT MARD: 12.1 to 16.8% and MRD: &minus 14.3 to &minus 9.1%). The accuracy of the no-calibration Dexcom G6 CGM was not significantly impacted by aerobic, resistance, or HIIT exercise. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2079-6374 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1482c54ed1c82be81388628329cb0064Test http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7600074Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....1482c54ed1c82be81388628329cb0064 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 20796374 |
|---|