دورية أكاديمية
Psychometric properties of the norwegian version of the electronic health literacy scale (eheals) among patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: Cross-sectional validation study
| العنوان: | Psychometric properties of the norwegian version of the electronic health literacy scale (eheals) among patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: Cross-sectional validation study |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Brørs, Gunhild, Wentzel-Larsen, Tore, Dalen, Håvard, Hansen, Tina B, Norman, Cameron D., Wahl, Astrid Klopstad, Norekvål, Tone M. |
| المصدر: | e17312 ; Journal of Medical Internet Research ; 22 ; 7 |
| بيانات النشر: | JMIR |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| المجموعة: | University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) |
| الوصف: | Background: Web-based technology has recently become an important source for sharing health information with patients after an acute cardiac event. Therefore, consideration of patients’ perceived electronic health (eHealth) literacy skills is crucial for improving the delivery of patient-centered health information. Objective: The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) to conditions in Norway, and to determine its psychometric properties. More specifically, we set out to determine the reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and construct validity (structural validity, hypotheses testing, and cross-cultural validity) of the eHEALS in self-report format administered to patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: The original English version of the eHEALS was translated into Norwegian following a widely used cross-cultural adaptation process. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach α. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed for a priori-specified 1-, 2-, and 3-factor models. Demographic, health-related internet use, health literacy, and health status information was collected to examine correlations with eHEALS scores. Results: A total of 1695 patients after percutaneous coronary intervention were included in the validation analysis. The mean age was 66 years, and the majority of patients were men (1313, 77.46%). Cronbach α for the eHEALS was >.99. The corresponding Cronbach α for the 2-week retest was .94. The test-retest ICC for eHEALS was 0.605 (95% CI 0.419-0.743, P<.001). The CFA showed a modest model fit for the 1- and 2-factor models (root mean square error of approximation>0.06). After modifications in the 3-factor model, all of the goodness-of-fit indices indicated a good fit. There was a weak correlation with age (r=–0.206). Between-groups analysis of variance showed a difference according to educational groups and the ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1438-8871 |
| العلاقة: | urn:issn:1438-8871; https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766822Test; https://doi.org/10.2196/17312Test; cristin:1836869; Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020, 22 (7), e17312. |
| DOI: | 10.2196/17312 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.2196/17312Test https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766822Test |
| حقوق: | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.noTest ; Copyright 2020 The Authors |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.962F4B4 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 14388871 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.2196/17312 |