دورية أكاديمية

Rio de Janeiro Global Consensus on Landmarks, Definitions, and Classifications in Barrett’s Esophagus: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi Study ; Consenso mundial de Río de Janeiro sobre hitos, definiciones y clasificaciones del esófago de Barrett: estudio Delphi de la Organización Mundial de Endoscopia

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Rio de Janeiro Global Consensus on Landmarks, Definitions, and Classifications in Barrett’s Esophagus: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi Study ; Consenso mundial de Río de Janeiro sobre hitos, definiciones y clasificaciones del esófago de Barrett: estudio Delphi de la Organización Mundial de Endoscopia
المؤلفون: Emura, Fabian, Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep, Hassan, Cesare, Armstrong, David, Messmann, Helmut, Arantes, Vitor, Araya, Raul, Barrera Leon, Oscar, Jacques, J.G., Bergman, H.M., Bandhari, Pradeep, Bourke, Michael J., Cerisoli, Cecilio, Wai-Yan Chiu, Philip, Desai, Madhav, Dinis Ribeiro, Mário, Falk, Gary W., Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro, Srinivas, Gaddam, Goda, Kenichi, Gross, Seth, Sharma , Prateek
المصدر: Universidad de La Sabana ; Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
بيانات النشر: Gastroenterology
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
مصطلحات موضوعية: Río de Janeiro, Consenso Global, Hitos, Clasificaciones en el esófago de Barrett, Endoscopia mundial, Rio de Janeiro, Global Consensus, Landmarks, Classifications in Barrett’s Esophagus, World Endoscopy
الوصف: 12 páginas ; Background & Aims Despite the significant advances made in the diagnosis and treatment of Barrett’s esophagus (BE), there is still a need for standardized definitions, appropriate recognition of endoscopic landmarks, and consistent use of classification systems. Current controversies in basic definitions of BE and the relative lack of anatomic knowledge are significant barriers to uniform documentation. We aimed to provide consensus-driven recommendations for uniform reporting and global application. Methods The World Endoscopy Organization Barrett's Esophagus Committee appointed leaders to develop an evidence-based Delphi study. A working group of 6 members identified and formulated 23 statements, and 30 internationally recognized experts from 18 countries participated in 3 rounds of voting. We defined consensus as agreement by ≥80% of experts for each statement and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. Results After 3 rounds of voting, experts achieved consensus on 6 endoscopic landmarks (palisade vessels, gastroesophageal junction, squamocolumnar junction, lesion location, extraluminal compressions, and quadrant orientation), 13 definitions (BE, hiatus hernia, squamous islands, columnar islands, Barrett’s endoscopic therapy, endoscopic resection, endoscopic ablation, systematic inspection, complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, complete eradication of dysplasia, residual disease, recurrent disease, and failure of endoscopic therapy), and 4 classification systems (Prague, Los Angeles, Paris, and Barrett’s International NBI Group). In round 1, 18 statements (78%) reached consensus, with 12 (67%) receiving strong agreement from more than half of the experts. In round 2, 4 of the remaining statements (80%) reached consensus, with 1 statement receiving strong agreement from 50% of the experts. In the third round, a consensus was reached on the remaining statement. ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
العلاقة: Gastroenterology, 163(1), 84-96; Emura, F., Chandrasekar, V. T., Hassan, C., Armstrong, D., Messmann, H., Arantes, V., . & Sharma, P. (2022). Rio de Janeiro Global Consensus on Landmarks, Definitions, and Classifications in Barrett’s Esophagus: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi Study. Gastroenterology, 163(1), 84-96.; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016508522002840Test; http://hdl.handle.net/10818/58163Test
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.022
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.022Test
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/58163Test
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016508522002840Test
حقوق: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Test/ ; RestrictedAccess
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.17DFF53B
قاعدة البيانات: BASE