Restoring Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Mice Fails to Fully Reverse Vascular Stiffness

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Restoring Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Mice Fails to Fully Reverse Vascular Stiffness
المؤلفون: Jochen Steppan, Sandeep Jandu, William Savage, Huilei Wang, Sara Kang, Roshini Narayanan, Daniel Nyhan, Lakshmi Santhanam
المصدر: Frontiers in Physiology, Vol 11 (2020)
Frontiers in Physiology
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media SA, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, hypertension, Vascular smooth muscle, Physiology, pulse wave velocity, Vasodilation, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, lcsh:Physiology, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Physiology (medical), Internal medicine, Heart rate, vascular smooth muscle cells, Medicine, Pulse wave velocity, Original Research, lcsh:QP1-981, business.industry, vascular stiffness, Angiotensin II, Endocrinology, Blood pressure, cardiovascular system, HN group, Aortic stiffness, reversal, business, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery
الوصف: BackgroundHypertension is a well-established driver of vascular remodeling and stiffening. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether restoring normal blood pressure (BP) fully restores vascular stiffness toward that of normotensive controls.MethodsC57Bl6/J male mice received angiotensin II (angII; 1 μg/kg/min) via infusion pump for 8 weeks (hypertension group: HH), angII for 4 weeks (hypertension group: H4), angII for 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks of recovery (reversal group: HN), or sham treatment (normotensive group: NN). BP, heart rate, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured longitudinally. At the end of the study period, aortas were harvested for testing of vasoreactivity, passive mechanical properties, and vessel structure.ResultsThe HH group exhibited a sustained increase in BP and PWV over the 8-week period (p < 0.01). In the HN group, BP and PWV increased during the 4-week angII infusion, and, though BP was restored during the 4-week recovery, PWV exhibited only partial restoration (p < 0.05). Heart rate was similar in all cohorts. Compared to NN controls, both HH and HN groups had significantly increased wall thickness (p < 0.05 HH vs. NN, p < 0.01 HN vs. NN), mucosal extracellular matrix accumulation (p < 0.0001 HH vs. NN, p < 0.05 HN vs. NN), and intralamellar distance (p < 0.001 HH vs. NN, p < 0.01 HN vs. NN). Both intact and decellularized vessels were noted to have significantly higher passive stiffness in the HH and H4 cohorts than in NN controls (p < 0.0001). However, in the HN cohort, intact vessels were only modestly stiffer than those of NN controls, and decellularized HN vessels were identical to those from the NN controls. Compared to NN controls, the HH and HN cohorts exhibited significantly diminished phenylephrine-induced contraction (p < 0.0001) and endothelium-dependent vasodilation (p < 0.05).ConclusionHypertension causes a significant increase in in vivo aortic stiffness that is only partially reversible after BP normalization. Although hypertension does lead to matrix stiffening, restoration of BP restores matrix mechanics to levels similar to those of normotensive controls. Nevertheless, endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction persist after restoration of normotension. This dysfunction is, in part, responsible for augmented PWV after restoration of BP.
تدمد: 1664-042X
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ae891b698c1cdd9313289d4b79322815Test
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00824Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....ae891b698c1cdd9313289d4b79322815
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE