FSRT vs. SRS in Brain Metastases—Differences in Local Control and Radiation Necrosis—A Volumetric Study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: FSRT vs. SRS in Brain Metastases—Differences in Local Control and Radiation Necrosis—A Volumetric Study
المؤلفون: Sabine Semrau, Johannes Roesch, Sebastian Lettmaier, Irina Filimonova, Thomas Weissmann, Florian Putz, Charlotte Schmitter, Manuel Schmidt, Dominik Oft, Veit Mengling, Rainer Fietkau, Luitpold Distel, Benjamin Frey, Christoph Bert, Hadi Siavooshhaghighi
المصدر: Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology, Vol 10 (2020)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media SA, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0301 basic medicine, Intervention trials, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_treatment, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), lcsh:RC254-282, Effective dose (radiation), Radiosurgery, Resection, Metastasis, Stereotactic radiotherapy, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Medizinische Fakultät, brain metastases, radiobiological aspects, medicine, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), ddc:610, Original Research, business.industry, segmentation, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, medicine.disease, Radiation necrosis, 030104 developmental biology, Oncology, Median time, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, volumetric analysis, Nuclear medicine, business
الوصف: Background: While the role of stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases is increasing, evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and single-session radiosurgery (SRS) is scarce.Methods: Longitudinal volumetric analysis was performed in a consecutive cohort of 120 patients and 190 brain metastases (>0.065 cm3 in volume / > ~5 mm in diameter) treated exclusively with FSRT (n = 98) and SRS (n = 92), respectively. A total of 972 tumor segmentations was used, averaging 5.1 time points per metastasis. Progression was defined using a volumetric extension of the RANO-BM criteria. Local control and radionecrosis were compared for lesions treated with FSRT and SRS, respectively.Results: Metastases treated with FSRT were significantly larger at baseline (mean, 4.66 vs. 0.40 cm3, p < 0.001). Biologically effective dose (BED) for metastases (α/β = 12, linear-quadratic-cubic model) was significantly associated with local control, whereas BED for normal brain (α/β = 2, linear-quadratic model) was significantly associated with radionecrosis. Median time to local progression was 22.9 months in the FSRT group compared to 14.5 months in the SRS group (p = 0.022). Overall radionecrosis rate at 12 months was 3.4% for FSRT and 14.8% for SRS (p = 0.010). Radionecrosis °IV requiring resection with histologic proof of radiation necrosis also was significantly reduced in the FSRT group (FSRT 0.0% vs. SRS 3.9%, p = 0.041). In multivariate analysis, FSRT was associated with reduced risk of progression (HR 0.47, p = 0.015) and reduced risk of radionecrosis (HR 0.18, p = 0.045).Conclusions: This volumetric study provides initial evidence that the improvements in therapeutic ratio expected for FSRT in larger brain metastases, might equally extend into the domain of smaller metastases, traditionally less considered for fractionated treatment. FSRT might constitute an important tool to further increase local control and reduce radionecrosis risk in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases, that should be assessed in randomized intervention trials.
وصف الملف: image/tiff; application/pdf
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2234-943X
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.559193
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0e648d41ac2bf5a55484b7056d6bee35Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....0e648d41ac2bf5a55484b7056d6bee35
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:2234943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.559193