التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
IT.1.2 - Development and usability tests of a Chronic Kidney Disease Dashboard: Presenter(s): Dorinde van der Horst, Antonius Ziekenhuis & Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands. |
| المؤلفون: |
van Uden, Nelly1 (AUTHOR), Parent, Ellen2 (AUTHOR), Bart, Hans3 (AUTHOR), Waverijn, Geeke2 (AUTHOR), Verberk-Jonkers, Iris2 (AUTHOR), van den Dorpel, Rene2 (AUTHOR), Pieterse, Arwen4 (AUTHOR), Jan Bos, Willem5 (AUTHOR) |
| المصدر: |
Patient Education & Counseling. 2023 Supplement, Vol. 109, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*CHRONIC kidney failure, *ACADEMIC medical centers, *PATIENT participation, *PATIENT reported outcome measures, *KNOWLEDGE transfer |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
NETHERLANDS |
| مستخلص: |
Improving information transfer during consultations with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients may stimulate Shared Decision Making (SDM) and add to patients' disease knowledge and activation. Dashboarding is a new strategy to visualize the information transfer during consultations, including individual clinical and patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to systematically develop a dashboard for CKD patients receiving treatment in the hospital, test its usability, and explore conditions for optimal use in practice. For development a participatory approach with patients and clinicians from three hospitals was used. Working groups and patient focus groups were conducted to identify needs and inform the dashboard's design. Usability was tested in patient interviews. A focus group with clinicians was held for identifying enablers for effective use of the dashboard in practice. A CKD dashboard was developed, visualizing both clinical and patient-reported individual outcomes over time, for use during consultations and accessible for patients at home. Both clinicians and patients indicated that they expect the dashboard to: motivate patients in adhering to their treatment plans, by providing outcome feedback over time; improve conversations by enhanced preparation of both clinicians and patients; better inform patients, thereby facilitating their involvement in decision-making. Clinicians and patients both stated that setting a topic agenda for the consultation together is important in effectively discussing the dashboard during consultations. Moreover, the dashboard should not dominate the conversation. Lastly, the usability tests provided useful design requirements for optimal user-friendliness and clarity. Dashboarding can be a valuable way to support clinical encounters by visualizing the information transfer. Our Findings: suggest it can stimulate patient activation and facilitate decision making. Co-creation with patients and clinicians was essential for successful development of the dashboard. Gained knowledge from this development process can inform others wishing to develop similar digital tools for use in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Academic Search Index |
