التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Educational intervention to improve critical thinking for undergraduate nursing students: A randomized clinical trial. |
| المؤلفون: |
Carbogim, Fábio da Costa, Barbosa, Amanda Conrado Silva, de Oliviera, Larissa Bertacchini, de Sá Diaz, Flávia Batísta Barbosa, Toledo, Luana Vieira, Alves, Katiusse Resende, Friedrich, Denise Barbosa de Castro, Luiz, Franciane Silva, Püschel, Vilanice Alves de Araújo |
| المصدر: |
Nurse Education in Practice; Nov2018, Vol. 33, p121-126, 6p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
ANALYSIS of covariance, CHI-squared test, CRITICAL thinking, LEARNING strategies, LIFE support systems in critical care, NURSING education, NURSING students, PROBLEM-based learning, PSYCHOLOGICAL tests, STATISTICAL sampling, T-test (Statistics), TEACHING methods, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, EDUCATIONAL outcomes, UNDERGRADUATES, DATA analysis software, DESCRIPTIVE statistics |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
BRAZIL |
| مستخلص: |
Abstract The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) versus PBL associated with the Active Learning Model for Critical Thinking (ALMCT) to improve critical thinking (CT) in nursing students in an educational intervention on Basic Life Support (BLS). A two-arm randomized, single-blinded, parallel clinical trial was carried out with 108 Brazilian undergraduate nursing students who participated in a BLS course. PBL + ALMCT was used in the control group (CG), and PBL was used in the experimental group (EG). Pre- and post-tests were used to evaluate CT dispositions using the California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory (CCTDI), and CT skills were evaluated using the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST). The results did not indicate significant differences between the CG and EG groups for total CCTDI and total CCTST scales and for most of their subscales. However, there was a significant difference in the EG when the mean scores on the pre- and post-test were compared on the CCTDI analyticity subscale (t = 2073; p = 0.043) and on the CCTST analysis subscale (t = 2302; p = 0.025). We strongly recommend further studies using PBL associated with ALMCT and randomized clinical trials that last more than one month. Highlights • Critical thinking contributes to assertiveness in clinical decision making. • ALMCT influences critical thinking improvement via analyticity disposition and analytical skill. • Self-report method tests that evaluate critical thinking should be interpreted with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Nurse Education in Practice is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Supplemental Index |
