التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity among community-dwelling older adults from four European countries: protocol for the process evaluation of the SITLESS randomised controlled trial |
| المؤلفون: |
Coll-Planas, Laura, Alias, Sergi Blancafort, Tully, Mark, Caserotti, Paolo, Giné-Garriga, Maria, Blackburn, Nicole, Skjødt, Mathias, Wirth, Katharina, Deidda, Manuela, McIntosh, Emma, Rothenbacher, Dietrich, Rodríguez, Rodrigo Gallardo, Jerez-Roig, Javier, Sansano-Nadal, Oriol, Santiago, Marta, Wilson, Jason, Guerra-Balic, Míriam, Martín-Borràs, Carme, Gonzalez, Denise, Lefebvre, Guillaume |
| المصدر: |
BMJ Open; Jun2019, Vol. 9 Issue 6, p1-9, 9p |
| مستخلص: |
Introduction SITLESS is a randomised controlled trial determining whether exercise referral schemes can be enhanced by self-management strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity in the long term, in community-dwelling older citizens. The intervention is complex and requires a process evaluation to understand how implementation, causal mechanisms and context shape outcomes. The specific aims are to assess fidelity and reach of the implementation, understand the contextual aspects of each intervention site, evaluate the mechanisms of impact, and explore perceived effects. Methods and analysis Following the Medical Research Council guidance on complex interventions, a combination of qualitative and quantitative procedures is applied, including observational checklists and attendance registries, standardised scales (ie, Marcus's Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Physical Activity Self- Regulation Scale and the Lubben Social Network Scale) at baseline, postintervention and follow-up assessments, semistructured questionnaires gathering contextual characteristics, and participant observations of the sessions. Semistructured interviews and focus groups with the participants and trainers are conducted at postintervention and during the follow-up to explore their experiences. Outcomes from the standardised scales are analysed as moderators within the impact evaluation. Descriptive results on context and perceived effects complement results on impact. The qualitative and quantitative findings will help to refine the logic model to finally support the interpretation of the results on the effectiveness of the intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of BMJ Open is the property of BMJ Publishing Group and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder