Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services
| العنوان: | Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Peter B. Jones, Emma Howarth, Ayla Humphrey, Joanna K. Anderson, Maris Vainre, Tamsin Ford |
| المساهمون: | Vainre, Maris [0000-0001-9570-3726], Jones, Peter [0000-0002-0387-880X], Ford, Tamsin Jane [0000-0001-5295-4904], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Anderson, Joanna K. [0000-0002-0565-3735] |
| المصدر: | BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2020) BMC Medical Research Methodology |
| بيانات النشر: | BMC, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Research design, Mental Health Services, Data collection, quality, and reporting, Knowledge management, Adolescent, Epidemiology, Project commissioning, media_common.quotation_subject, MEDLINE, Health Informatics, Scientific evidence, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Humans, Quality (business), 030212 general & internal medicine, Child, media_common, Protocol (science), lcsh:R5-920, business.industry, 030503 health policy & services, Mental health, Knowledge base, England, Adolescent Health Services, Research Design, 0305 other medical science, business, Psychology, lcsh:Medicine (General), Delivery of Health Care, Research Article |
| الوصف: | Funder: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - East of England Background: There is consensus that health services commissioning and clinical practice should be driven by scientific evidence. However, workload pressures, accessibility of peer reviewed publications and skills to find, appraise, and synthesise relevant evidence are often cited as barriers to uptake of research evidence by practitioners and commissioners alike. In recent years a growing requirement for rapid evidence synthesis to inform commissioning decisions about healthcare service delivery and provision of care contributed to an increasing popularity of scoping literature reviews (SLRs). Yet, comprehensive guidelines for conducting and reporting SLRs are still relatively scarce. Methods: The exemplar review used as a worked example aimed to provide a readily available, comprehensive, and user-friendly repository of research evidence for local commissioners to help them make evidence-informed decisions about redesigning East of England Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services. In conducting the review, we were broadly guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, however some modifications were made at different stages to better reflect the largely pragmatic objective of this review. This paper compares the methodology used with existing methodological frameworks for scoping studies, to add to the existing knowledge base. Results: We proposed the following advancements to the existing SLR frameworks: (i) Assemble a research team with complementary skills and expertise; (ii); Draw on expertise of external partners, particularly practitioners, decision-makers and commissioners who will be translating findings into practice; (iii) Pre-register the review protocol. Keep a detailed record of all steps and decisions and consider how they would impact on generalisability and utility of review findings; (iv) Use systematic procedures for literature searchers, selection of studies, data extraction and analysis; (v) If feasible, appraise the quality of included evidence; (vi) Be transparent about limitations of findings. Conclusions: Despite some methodological limitations, scoping literature reviews are a useful method of rapidly synthesising a large body of evidence to inform commissioning and transformation of CAMHS. SLRs allow researchers to start with a broader questions, to explore the issue from different perspectives and perhaps find more comprehensive solutions that are not only effective, but also accounted for their feasibility and acceptability to key stakeholders. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf; application/zip; text/xml |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1471-2288 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::4f167dcdfd8990d9397b6cf47a5e4461Test http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-01127-3Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....4f167dcdfd8990d9397b6cf47a5e4461 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 14712288 |
|---|