The Frail’BESTest: an adaptation of the 'balance evaluation system test' for frail older adults; Concurrent validity, responsiveness, validity for fall prediction and detection of slower walkers
العنوان: | The Frail’BESTest: an adaptation of the 'balance evaluation system test' for frail older adults; Concurrent validity, responsiveness, validity for fall prediction and detection of slower walkers |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | L. Coquisart, F. Mourey, Alexandre Kubicki, G. Basile, Davy Laroche, M. Brika |
المصدر: | European Review of Aging and Physical Activity |
بيانات النشر: | BioMed Central, 2021. |
سنة النشر: | 2021 |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Predictive validity, Balance, Frail older adults, medicine.medical_specialty, Systemic assessment, Psychometrics, Tinetti test, Concurrent validity, Rehabilitation, Test (assessment), Standard error, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Test score, medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, human activities, Mathematics, Balance (ability), Research Article |
الوصف: | Background The Frail’BESTest was developed in order to include frail older adults when they are using the BESTest. Recently, psychometrics properties (internal coherence, systems usefulness, complementarity and inter-rater reliability) of the Frail’BESTest were tested. To complete these analyses, this study will aim the assessment of its concurrent validity, responsiveness, predictive validity on falls occurrence, and slower walkers detection. Methods The correlation between the Frail’BESTest and the Gait Speed Test permitted to assess concurrent validity. The variation between the initial test score and the score obtained after the completion of a rehabilitation program was used to evaluate responsiveness with MANOVA analysis and standard response mean (SRM) calculation. Predictive validity was assessed with receiver-operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) analysis regarding falls occurrence. Slower walkers detection thresholds were computed by receiver-operating characteristic curves for the Frail’BESTest and the Tinetti test. Results The concurrent validity of the test was good (r = 0.74; p Conclusion Concurrent validity and responsiveness of the Frail’BESTest were good. As for the Tinetti and the Frail’BESTest, they were unable to predict efficiently falls occurrence in the tested sample. The Frail’BESTest seems enough sensitive to spot the slower walkers efficiently, using a 15/20 threshold method. The Frail’BESTest was found to be a valid and responsive clinical test, therefore it can be recommended as an outcome measure in clinical practice. |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 1861-6909 1813-7253 |
الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::4f48a3d03d2e47787051bcbf64334f7aTest http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC8555199Test |
حقوق: | OPEN |
رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....4f48a3d03d2e47787051bcbf64334f7a |
قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
تدمد: | 18616909 18137253 |
---|