Reading as Statistical Learning

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Reading as Statistical Learning
المؤلفون: Joanne Arciuli
المصدر: Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 49:634-643
بيانات النشر: American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: Linguistics and Language, media_common.quotation_subject, Teaching method, Speech Therapy, 050105 experimental psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literacy, Dyslexia, Speech and Hearing, Reading (process), Learning to read, medicine, Mathematics education, Humans, Learning, Computer Simulation, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Child, Probability, media_common, 05 social sciences, Linguistics, medicine.disease, Language acquisition, Reading, Word recognition, Computational linguistics, Psychology, 050104 developmental & child psychology
الوصف: Purpose The purpose of this tutorial is to explain how learning to read can be thought of as learning statistical regularities and to demonstrate why this is relevant for theory, modeling, and practice. This tutorial also shows how triangulation of methods and cross-linguistic research can be used to gain insight. Method The impossibility of conveying explicitly all of the regularities that children need to acquire in a deep orthography, such as English, can be demonstrated by examining lesser-known probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress. Detection of these kinds of cues likely occurs via a type of implicit learning known as statistical learning (SL). The first part of the tutorial focuses on these points. Next, studies exploring how individual differences in the capacity for SL relate to variability in word reading accuracy in the general population are discussed. A brief overview of research linking impaired SL and dyslexia is also provided. The final part of the tutorial focuses on how we might supplement explicit literacy instruction with implicit learning methods and emphasizes the value of testing the efficacy of new techniques in the classroom. The basic and applied research reviewed here includes corpus analyses, behavioral testing, computational modeling, and classroom-based research. Although some of these methods are not commonly used in clinical research, the depth and breadth of this body of work provide a compelling case for why reading can be thought of as SL and how this view can inform practice. Conclusion Implicit methods that draw on the principles of SL can supplement the much-needed explicit instruction that helps children learn to read. This synergy of methods has the potential to spark innovative practices in literacy instruction and remediation provided by educators and clinicians to support typical learners and those with developmental disabilities.
تدمد: 1558-9129
0161-1461
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6f66a72f2162f66f2071d6ebe38f17b1Test
https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_lshss-stlt1-17-0135Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....6f66a72f2162f66f2071d6ebe38f17b1
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE