Efficacy of mindfulness-based addiction treatment (MBAT) for smoking cessation and lapse recovery: A randomized clinical trial
| العنوان: | Efficacy of mindfulness-based addiction treatment (MBAT) for smoking cessation and lapse recovery: A randomized clinical trial |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Yisheng Li, Yumei Cao, Jennifer Irvin Vidrine, Hilary A. Tindle, Linda V Safranek, Whitney L. Heppner, Micki Fine, David W. Wetter, Claire Adams Spears, Andrew J. Waters, Lorraine R. Reitzel, Paul M. Cinciripini, Nga Nguyen, Marianne T. Marcus |
| المصدر: | Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 84:824-838 |
| بيانات النشر: | American Psychological Association (APA), 2016. |
| سنة النشر: | 2016 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | medicine.medical_specialty, Mindfulness, Nicotine patch, medicine.medical_treatment, media_common.quotation_subject, 030508 substance abuse, Relapse prevention, law.invention, Group psychotherapy, Nicotine, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Randomized controlled trial, law, Internal medicine, medicine, 030212 general & internal medicine, media_common, business.industry, Abstinence, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Smoking cessation, 0305 other medical science, business, Clinical psychology, medicine.drug |
| الوصف: | OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment (MBAT) to a Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT) that matched MBAT on treatment contact time, and a Usual Care (UC) condition that comprised brief individual counseling. METHOD Participants (N = 412) were 48.2% African American, 41.5% non-Latino White, 5.4% Latino, and 4.9% other, and 57.6% reported a total annual household income < $30,000. The majority of participants were female (54.9%). Mean cigarettes per day was 19.9 (SD = 10.1). Following the baseline visit, participants were randomized to UC (n = 103), CBT (n = 155), or MBAT (n = 154). All participants were given self-help materials and nicotine patch therapy. CBT and MBAT groups received 8 2-hr in-person group counseling sessions. UC participants received 4 brief individual counseling sessions. Biochemically verified smoking abstinence was assessed 4 and 26 weeks after the quit date. RESULTS Logistic random effects model analyses over time indicated no overall significant treatment effects (completers only: F(2, 236) = 0.29, p = .749; intent-to-treat: F(2, 401) = 0.9, p = .407). Among participants classified as smoking at the last treatment session, analyses examining the recovery of abstinence revealed a significant overall treatment effect, F(2, 103) = 4.41, p = .015 (MBAT vs. CBT: OR = 4.94, 95% CI: 1.47 to 16.59, p = .010, Effect Size = .88; MBAT vs. UC: OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 1.04 to 16.75, p = .043, Effect Size = .79). CONCLUSION Although there were no overall significant effects of treatment on abstinence, MBAT may be more effective than CBT or UC in promoting recovery from lapses. (PsycINFO Database Record |
| تدمد: | 1939-2117 0022-006X |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1b3733d2d78a3fb3a480f61116447d7aTest https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000117Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi...........1b3733d2d78a3fb3a480f61116447d7a |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 19392117 0022006X |
|---|